Garcia Andrea N, Patel Kushang V, Guralnik Jack M
Laboratory of Epidemiology, Demography, and Biometry, National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-9205, USA.
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Sep;33(3):200-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.04.032.
Accidents (including motor vehicle injuries) are a leading cause of death among American Indians/Alaskan Natives (AI/AN). The purpose of this study was to examine geographic variation and the existence of a seat belt law on seat belt use among AI/AN and non-Hispanic whites (NHW).
Self-reported seat belt behavior data from the 1997 and 2002 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were analyzed in 2006-2007 and were restricted to AI/AN (n=4,310 for 2002, and n=1,758 for 1997) and NHW (n=193,617 for 2002, and n=108,551 for 1997) aged 18 years and older.
Seat belt non-use varied significantly across geographic regions for both AI/AN and NHW. For example, AI/AN living in the Northern Plains (odds ratio [OR]=12.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]=6.5-23.7) and Alaska (OR=10.3, 95%CI=5.3-19.9) had significantly higher seat belt non-use compared to AI/AN living in the West. In addition, compared to those residing in urban areas, those living in rural areas were 60% more likely in NHW and 2.6 times more likely in AI/AN not to wear a seat belt. Both AI/AN and NHW living in states without primary seat belt laws were approximately twice as likely to report seat belt non-use in 2002 as those living in states with primary laws. In states with primary laws enacted between 1997 and 2002, AI/AN experienced greater decline in seat belt non-use than NHW.
Seat belt use among AI/AN and NHW varied significantly by region and urban-rural residency in 2002. Primary seat belt laws appear to help reduce regional and racial disparities in seat belt non-use.
事故(包括机动车伤害)是美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)死亡的主要原因之一。本研究的目的是调查AI/AN和非西班牙裔白人(NHW)在安全带使用方面的地理差异以及安全带法律的存在情况。
2006 - 2007年对1997年和2002年行为危险因素监测系统中自我报告的安全带使用行为数据进行了分析,数据仅限于18岁及以上的AI/AN(2002年n = 4310,1997年n = 1758)和NHW(2002年n = 193617,1997年n = 108551)。
AI/AN和NHW在不同地理区域的安全带未使用率差异显著。例如,与居住在西部的AI/AN相比,居住在北部平原的AI/AN(优势比[OR]=12.4,95%置信区间[CI]=6.5 - 23.7)和阿拉斯加的AI/AN(OR = 10.3,95%CI = 5.3 - 19.9)安全带未使用率显著更高。此外,与居住在城市地区的人相比,居住在农村地区的NHW不系安全带的可能性高60%,AI/AN则高2.6倍。2002年,居住在没有主要安全带法律的州的AI/AN和NHW报告安全带未使用的可能性约为居住在有主要法律的州的人的两倍。在1997年至2002年颁布主要法律的州,AI/AN的安全带未使用率下降幅度大于NHW。
2002年,AI/AN和NHW的安全带使用情况在地区和城乡居住方面存在显著差异。主要安全带法律似乎有助于减少安全带未使用方面的地区和种族差异。