Maestri Roberto, Pinna Gian Domenico, Porta Alberto, Balocchi Rita, Sassi Roberto, Signorini Maria Gabriella, Dudziak Maria, Raczak Grzegorz
Dipartimento di Bioingegneria, Fondazione S Maugeri, IRCCS, 27040 Montescano, Italy.
Physiol Meas. 2007 Sep;28(9):1067-77. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/28/9/008. Epub 2007 Aug 21.
Several parameters assessing nonlinear properties of heart rate variability (HRV) from short-term (<10 min) laboratory recordings have been proposed so far, but their reliability is unknown. In this study, we addressed this issue analysing a comprehensive set of these indices. In 42 healthy subjects (mean age (min-max): 38 (26-56) years, 21 men) we recorded 5 min of supine ECG in two consecutive days. From RR intervals we computed 11 nonlinear HRV indices, representative of symbolic dynamics, entropy, fractality, predictability, empirical mode decomposition and Poincaré plot families. Absolute reliability was assessed by the 95% limits of random variation and relative reliability was assessed computing the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). We found marked differences in the reliability of short-term nonlinear indices of HRV. In the majority of indices, changes in test-retest measurements ranged between about -30% and +50%, indicating good absolute reliability while in the others the change was <-60% and >140%. Relative reliability was substantial (0.6 < ICC < 0.8) in half of the indices, moderate in one and poor in the remaining. Compared to classical linear indices, nonlinear HRV parameters seem more suitable for individual test-retest evaluations but, due to a reduced ICC, they need increased sample size in comparative studies involving two groups of subjects.
到目前为止,已经提出了几个根据短期(<10分钟)实验室记录评估心率变异性(HRV)非线性特性的参数,但其可靠性尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们通过分析一套全面的这些指标来解决这个问题。在42名健康受试者(平均年龄(最小值 - 最大值):38(26 - 56)岁,21名男性)中,我们连续两天记录了5分钟的仰卧位心电图。从RR间期我们计算了11个非线性HRV指标,代表符号动力学、熵、分形性、可预测性、经验模式分解和庞加莱图族。通过随机变化的95%界限评估绝对可靠性,并通过计算组内相关系数(ICC)评估相对可靠性。我们发现HRV短期非线性指标的可靠性存在显著差异。在大多数指标中,重测测量的变化范围在约-30%至+50%之间,表明绝对可靠性良好,而在其他指标中,变化<-60%且>140%。一半的指标相对可靠性较高(0.6 < ICC < 0.8),一个指标为中等,其余指标较差。与经典线性指标相比,非线性HRV参数似乎更适合个体重测评估,但由于ICC降低,在涉及两组受试者的比较研究中需要增加样本量。