Horwitz W, Albert R
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1985 Jan-Feb;68(1):112-21.
For analysis of drug dosage forms, precision measures of AOAC approved automated methods, usually containing a spectrophotometric or fluorometric measurement step, were recalculated on a consistent statistical basis, using a computer program "FDACHEMIST." Ten collaborative studies of 14 compounds in 38 materials, consisting of various dosage forms, usually in 10 replications by an average of 7 laboratories, with a total of 2461 determinations, were reviewed. The average relative standard deviations within-laboratory (RSDo) and among-laboratories (RSDx) were 1.1 and 1.9%, respectively, and the ratio of RSDo/RSDx was 0.57, with an average outlier rate of 0.57% of the reported values. The line of best fit for RSDx plotted against - log concentration increases slightly with decreasing concentration, extending from an RSDx of about 1.6% at 100% concentration to an RSDx of 2.2% at 0.1% concentration, a change in RSDx of about 0.2% for a 10-fold decrease in concentration, independent of analyte and matrix.
对于药物剂型的分析,使用计算机程序“FDACHEMIST”,在一致的统计基础上重新计算了美国官方分析化学师协会(AOAC)批准的自动化方法的精密度指标,这些方法通常包含分光光度法或荧光测定法测量步骤。回顾了对38种材料中14种化合物进行的10项协作研究,这些材料包括各种剂型,通常由7个实验室平均进行10次重复测定,共计2461次测定。实验室内平均相对标准偏差(RSDo)和实验室间平均相对标准偏差(RSDx)分别为1.1%和1.9%,RSDo/RSDx的比值为0.57,报告值的平均异常值率为0.57%。以RSDx对-log浓度作图的最佳拟合线随着浓度降低略有上升,从100%浓度时的RSDx约1.6%延伸至0.1%浓度时的RSDx 2.2%,浓度每降低10倍,RSDx变化约0.2%,与分析物和基质无关。