Performance characteristics of methods of analysis used for regulatory purposes. I. Drug dosage forms. E. miscellaneous methods.

Precision parameters of miscellaneous methods for the analysis of drug dosage forms approved by AOAC since 1972, and not previously reviewed in this series, were recalculated on a consistent statistical basis by using the computer program FDACHEMIST. Seventeen published collaborative studies were reviewed; the studies encompassed 19 analytes in 80 different materials (dosage forms), 102 collaborative assays, approximately 10 laboratories per study, and principally direct spectrophotometric, polarographic, and spectroscopic methods, for a total of 1451 determinations. The average repeatability relative standard deviation (within-laboratories, RSDo) for the instrumental methods was 1.5%; the reproducibility relative standard deviation (among-laboratories, including within-, RSDx) was 2.6%; the ratio RSDo/RSDx of the averages was 0.57, with an average outlier rate of 2.7% of the reported determinations. The line of best fit of RSDx for the instrumental methods plotted against the negative logarithm of the concentration increases slightly with decreasing concentration, extending from an RSDx of approximately 2.0% at 100% concentration to an RSDx of 3.4% at 0.001% (10 ppm) concentration; this represents an RSDx change of approximately 0.3% (absolute) for each 10-fold decrease in concentration, independent of analyte, matrix, and method. A method for determining precipitated allergenic protein by the micro-Kjeldahl technique appeared to be outside this general relation, showing an RSDx of about 13% at a concentration of 0.015% (150 ppm) nitrogen.