Briggs D E, Fortey R A
Science. 1989 Oct 13;246(4927):241-3. doi: 10.1126/science.246.4927.241.
Cambrian arthropods are now well known, but there has been little agreement on how they contribute to an understanding of arthropod phylogeny. Fossils have either been lumped together as "trilobitomorphs" or, more recently, have been the subject of speculation invoking a multiple polyphyletic origin of arthropods. Cladistic analysis of characters of Cambrian and living representatives (excluding Uniramia) shows that trilobites and chelicerates are relatively advanced compared with "crustaceans," and there are doubts whether the latter constitute a national group. An undue emphasis on singular autapomorphies of problematic fossils has obscured these relationships in the past. "Trilobitomorphs" were simply an artificial taxon based on shared primitive characters. The arthropods that evolved during the Cambrian radiation show no more apparent morphological diversity than do the living groups. The evidence of wellpreserved problematica is critical to understanding the nature of this radiation and the affinities of the groups that remain today.
寒武纪节肢动物如今已广为人知,但对于它们如何有助于理解节肢动物系统发育,人们却很少达成共识。化石要么被归为“三叶虫类”,要么最近成为引发节肢动物多源起源猜测的对象。对寒武纪和现存代表物种(不包括单枝动物亚门)的性状进行分支系统分析表明,与“甲壳类动物”相比,三叶虫和螯肢动物相对更高级,而且人们怀疑后者是否构成一个自然类群。过去,对有问题化石独特的自动衍征的过度强调掩盖了这些关系。“三叶虫类”仅仅是一个基于共同原始性状的人为分类单元。在寒武纪辐射期间演化出的节肢动物,其形态多样性并不比现存类群更明显。保存完好的疑难化石证据对于理解这次辐射的本质以及当今留存类群的亲缘关系至关重要。