Levasseur Mélanie, Desrosiers Johanne, St-Cyr Tribble Denise
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC.
Can J Occup Ther. 2007;74 Spec No.:233-42. doi: 10.1177/000841740707405S02.
The conceptualisation of participation is important for both clinicians and researchers. Purpose. Analyse and compare two conceptual models, the Disability Creation Process (DCP) and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), with particular emphasis on the participation component.
Conceptual comparative analysis of the DCP and ICF models focused on participation.
We found more differences than similarities between the DCP and ICF models. Similarities concerned approaches, objectives, elements of the models' components, and, to some extent, the participation component itself Differences were mainly in the underlying models, conceptualisation of components including participation, and the measurement tools of participation.
Based on the results of this conceptual comparison, occupational therapists working in clinical and research settings are encouraged to consider using the DCP, which is an excellent model to choose in regard to participation. Empirical studies are still needed to clarify the concept of participation.
参与的概念化对临床医生和研究人员都很重要。目的：分析和比较两种概念模型，即残疾创造过程（DCP）和国际功能、残疾和健康分类（ICF），特别强调参与部分。
对DCP和ICF模型进行侧重于参与的概念比较分析。
我们发现DCP和ICF模型之间的差异多于相似之处。相似之处涉及方法、目标、模型组成部分的要素，以及在某种程度上参与部分本身。差异主要在于基础模型、包括参与在内的组成部分的概念化，以及参与的测量工具。
基于这一概念比较的结果，鼓励在临床和研究环境中工作的职业治疗师考虑使用DCP，这是在参与方面可供选择的一个优秀模型。仍需要实证研究来阐明参与的概念。
