Salminen S
Department of Social Psychology, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Psychol Rep. 1991 Dec;69(3 Pt 1):787-90. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1991.69.3.787.
The Kramer-Froehle controversy about the construct validity of FIRO-B questionnaire was evaluated with a multitrait-multimethod design. 113 women and 26 men completed the FIRO-B questionnaire. After the examiner had given a lecture on the FIRO-dimensions, the subjects rated themselves on these dimensions. Only three out of six intercorrelations on the validity diagonal were statistically significant. Of the discriminant validity comparisons 80% met the required criterion. Our results confirmed Kramer's results about the construct validity of the FIRO-B questionnaire.
采用多特质-多方法设计对克莱默-弗勒关于FIRO-B问卷结构效度的争议进行了评估。113名女性和26名男性完成了FIRO-B问卷。在考官就FIRO维度进行讲座后，受试者对自己在这些维度上进行了评分。效度对角线上的六个相互关系中只有三个具有统计学意义。在区分效度比较中，80%符合要求的标准。我们的结果证实了克莱默关于FIRO-B问卷结构效度的结果。
