Suppr超能文献

分散注意力对错误记忆的影响取决于记忆的测试方式。

The effect of divided attention on false memory depends on how memory is tested.

作者信息

Dewhurst Stephen A, Barry Christopher, Swannell Ellen R, Holmes Selna J, Bathurst Gemma L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, England.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2007 Jun;35(4):660-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03193304.

Abstract

In three experiments, we investigated the effects of divided attention on false memory, using the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants studied six DRM lists with full attention and six in one of two divided-attention conditions (random number generation or digit monitoring). Both divided-attention conditions increased false recall of related words (Experiment 1) but reduced false recognition (Experiment 2). These results were confirmed in Experiment 3, in which the type of secondary task was manipulated within groups. We argue that the increase in false recall with divided attention reflects a change in participants' response criterion, whereas the decrease in false recognition occurs because the secondary tasks prevent participants from generating associates of the words presented at study.

摘要

在三项实验中,我们采用迪斯/罗迪格-麦克德莫特(DRM)范式,研究了分散注意力对错误记忆的影响。在实验1和实验2中,参与者在全神贯注的状态下学习六个DRM词表,在两种分散注意力条件(随机数字生成或数字监测)之一的状态下学习另外六个词表。两种分散注意力条件均增加了对相关词的错误回忆(实验1),但减少了错误识别(实验2)。这些结果在实验3中得到了证实,在实验3中,次要任务的类型在组内进行了操控。我们认为,分散注意力时错误回忆的增加反映了参与者反应标准的变化,而错误识别的减少是因为次要任务阻止了参与者生成学习时呈现单词的联想。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验