Whittlesea Bruce W A, Masson Michael E J, Hughes Andrea D
Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Psychol Res. 2005 Jun;69(5-6):420-30. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0213-1. Epub 2005 Apr 26.
This article examines a false memory phenomenon, the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) effect, consisting of high false alarms for a prototype word (e.g., SLEEP) following a study list consisting of its associates (NIGHT, DREAM, etc.). This false recognition is thought to occur because prototypes, although not presented within a study list, are highly activated by their semantic association with words that are in the list. The authors present an alternative explanation of the effect, based on the discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. According to that account, false (and true) familiarity results when a comparison between expectations and outcomes within a processing episode causes surprise. Experiment 1 replicates the DRM effect. Experiment 2 shows that a similar effect can occur when participants are shown lists of unrelated words and are then surprised by a recognition target. Experiments 3 and 4 show that the DRM effect itself is abolished when participants are prevented from being surprised by prototypes presented as recognition targets. It is proposed that the DRM effect is best understood through the principles of construction, evaluation, and attribution.
本文考察了一种错误记忆现象,即迪斯-罗迪格-麦克德莫特(DRM)效应,该效应表现为在由某个原型词(如SLEEP)的关联词(NIGHT、DREAM等)组成的学习列表之后,对该原型词出现大量错误警报。这种错误识别被认为是由于原型词虽未出现在学习列表中,但通过与列表中的词的语义关联而被高度激活。作者基于差异归因假设提出了对该效应的另一种解释。根据该解释,当在一个加工过程中期望与结果之间的比较产生意外时,就会出现错误(和正确)的熟悉感。实验1重现了DRM效应。实验2表明,当向参与者展示不相关单词列表,然后让他们对一个识别目标感到意外时,也会出现类似的效应。实验3和实验4表明,当参与者不会因作为识别目标呈现的原型词而感到意外时,DRM效应本身就会消除。本文提出,最好通过构建、评估和归因原则来理解DRM效应。