Gu Steven, He Janet, Ho Wing-Ting, Ramineni Suneela, Thal David M, Natesh Ramanathan, Tesmer John J G, Hepler John R, Heximer Scott P
Department of Physiology, Heart and Stroke/Richard Lewar Centre of Excellence in Cardiovascular Research, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Biol Chem. 2007 Nov 9;282(45):33064-75. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M702685200. Epub 2007 Sep 11.
RGS2 and RGS5 are inhibitors of G-protein signaling belonging to the R4/B subfamily of RGS proteins. We here show that RGS2 is a much more potent attenuator of M1 muscarinic receptor signaling than RGS5. We hypothesize that this difference is mediated by variation in their ability to constitutively associate with the plasma membrane (PM). Compared with full-length RGS2, the RGS-box domains of RGS2 and RGS5 both show reduced PM association and activity. Prenylation of both RGS-box domains increases activity to RGS2 levels, demonstrating that lipid bilayer targeting increases RGS domain function. Amino-terminal domain swaps confirm that key determinants of localization and function are found within this important regulatory domain. An RGS2 amphipathic helix domain mutant deficient for phospholipid binding (L45D) shows reduced PM association and activity despite normal binding to the M1 muscarinic receptor third intracellular loop and activated Galpha(q). Replacement of a unique dileucine motif adjacent to the RGS2 helix with corresponding RGS5 residues disrupts both PM localization and function. These data suggest that RGS2 contains a hydrophobic extension of its helical domain that imparts high efficiency binding to the inner leaflet of the lipid bilayer. In support of this model, disruption of membrane phospholipid composition with N-ethylmaleimide reduces PM association of RGS2, without affecting localization of the M1 receptor or Galpha(q). Together, these data indicate that novel features within the RGS2 amphipathic alpha helix facilitate constitutive PM targeting and more efficient inhibition of M1 muscarinic receptor signaling than RGS5 and other members of the R4/B subfamily.
RGS2和RGS5是属于RGS蛋白R4/B亚家族的G蛋白信号转导抑制剂。我们在此表明,RGS2对M1毒蕈碱受体信号转导的衰减作用比RGS5强得多。我们推测这种差异是由它们与质膜(PM)组成性结合能力的差异介导的。与全长RGS2相比,RGS2和RGS5的RGS盒结构域均显示出与PM的结合减少和活性降低。两个RGS盒结构域的异戊二烯化将活性提高到RGS2水平,表明脂质双层靶向增加了RGS结构域的功能。氨基末端结构域交换证实,定位和功能的关键决定因素存在于这个重要的调节结构域内。尽管与M1毒蕈碱受体第三细胞内环和活化的Gαq正常结合,但缺乏磷脂结合能力的RGS2两亲螺旋结构域突变体(L45D)显示出与PM的结合减少和活性降低。用相应的RGS5残基取代RGS2螺旋附近独特的双亮氨酸基序会破坏PM定位和功能。这些数据表明,RGS2的螺旋结构域含有一个疏水延伸部分,使其能够高效结合脂质双层的内小叶。支持这一模型的是,用N-乙基马来酰亚胺破坏膜磷脂组成会降低RGS2与PM的结合,而不影响M1受体或Gαq的定位。总之,这些数据表明,RGS2两亲性α螺旋内的新特征促进了组成性PM靶向,并比RGS5和R4/B亚家族的其他成员更有效地抑制M1毒蕈碱受体信号转导。