• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年物质使用病因建模:社会发展模型的检验

Modeling the Etiology of Adolescent Substance Use: A Test of the Social Development Model.

作者信息

Catalano Richard F, Kosterman Rick, Hawkins J David, Newcomb Michael D, Abbott Robert D

机构信息

Social Development Research Group, School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle.

出版信息

J Drug Issues. 1996;26(2):429-455. doi: 10.1177/002204269602600207.

DOI:10.1177/002204269602600207
PMID:17848978
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1976125/
Abstract

The social development model is a general theory of human behavior that seeks to explain antisocial behaviors through specification of predictive developmental relationships. It incorporates the effects of empirical predictors ("risk factors" and "protective factors") for antisocial behavior and attempts to synthesize the most strongly supported propositions of control theory, social learning theory, and differential association theory. This article examines the power of social development model constructs measured at ages 9 to 10 and 13 to 14 to predict drug use at ages 17 to 18. The sample of 590 is from the longitudinal panel of the Seattle Social Development Project, which in 1985 sampled fifth grade students from high crime neighborhoods in Seattle, Washington. Structural equation modeling techniques were used to examine the fit of the model to the data. Although all but one path coefficient were significant and in the expected direction, the model did not fit the data as well as expected (CFI=.87). We next specified second-order factors for each path to capture the substantial common variance in the constructs' opportunities, involvement, and rewards. This model fit the data well (CFI=.90). We conclude that the social development model provides an acceptable fit to predict drug use at ages 17 to 18. Implications for the temporal nature of key constructs and for prevention are discussed.

摘要

社会发展模型是一种关于人类行为的一般理论,旨在通过明确预测性发展关系来解释反社会行为。它纳入了反社会行为的实证预测因素(“风险因素”和“保护因素”)的影响,并试图综合控制理论、社会学习理论和差别交往理论中最受支持的命题。本文考察了在9至10岁以及13至14岁时所测量的社会发展模型结构对17至18岁时吸毒行为的预测能力。590名样本来自西雅图社会发展项目的纵向研究小组,该小组于1985年从华盛顿州西雅图高犯罪率社区抽取了五年级学生。采用结构方程建模技术来检验模型与数据的拟合度。尽管除一个路径系数外所有系数均显著且方向符合预期,但模型与数据的拟合度并未达到预期(比较拟合指数CFI = 0.87)。接下来,我们为每条路径指定二阶因素,以捕捉结构中的机会、参与和奖励方面的大量共同方差。该模型与数据拟合良好(CFI = 0.90)。我们得出结论,社会发展模型为预测17至18岁时的吸毒行为提供了可接受的拟合度。文中还讨论了关键结构的时间性质及预防方面的意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a75/1976125/dbd06be72459/nihms-18393-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a75/1976125/d5c28f6b7e92/nihms-18393-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a75/1976125/1c6be0b83ed7/nihms-18393-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a75/1976125/dbd06be72459/nihms-18393-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a75/1976125/d5c28f6b7e92/nihms-18393-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a75/1976125/1c6be0b83ed7/nihms-18393-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a75/1976125/dbd06be72459/nihms-18393-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Modeling the Etiology of Adolescent Substance Use: A Test of the Social Development Model.青少年物质使用病因建模:社会发展模型的检验
J Drug Issues. 1996;26(2):429-455. doi: 10.1177/002204269602600207.
2
The social predictors of adolescent alcohol misuse: a test of the social development model.青少年酒精滥用的社会预测因素:社会发展模型的一项检验
J Stud Alcohol. 2001 Mar;62(2):179-89. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2001.62.179.
3
Testing the Social Interaction Learning Model's Applicability to Adolescent Substance Misuse in an Australian Context.在澳大利亚背景下测试社会互动学习模型对青少年药物滥用问题的适用性。
Subst Use Misuse. 2018 Sep 19;53(11):1859-1868. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2018.1441307. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
4
Mediator effects in the social development model: an examination of constituent theories.社会发展模型中的中介效应:对构成理论的考察
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2005;15(4):221-35. doi: 10.1002/cbm.27.
5
Risk versus direct protective factors and youth violence: Seattle social development project.风险因素与直接保护因素和青少年暴力:西雅图社会发展项目。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Aug;43(2 Suppl 1):S41-56. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.030.
6
Predictors of in-school and out-of-school sport injury prevention: A test of the trans-contextual model.预测校内和校外运动损伤预防的因素:跨情境模型的检验。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021 Jan;31(1):215-225. doi: 10.1111/sms.13826. Epub 2020 Sep 26.
7
Factors associated with youth gang membership in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.低收入和中等收入国家与青少年帮派成员身份相关的因素:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 29;14(1):1-128. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.11. eCollection 2018.
8
Direct and mediated associations between religious coping, spirituality, and youth violence in El Salvador.萨尔瓦多宗教应对、精神信仰与青少年暴力的直接和间接关联。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013 Sep;34(3):183-9.
9
Qualitative Study定性研究
10
The development of health protective behaviors among college students.大学生健康保护行为的发展
J Behav Med. 1996 Apr;19(2):143-61. doi: 10.1007/BF01857604.

引用本文的文献

1
We Need a Village: School Connectedness Empowers Students to Move Beyond Bystanding Under an Anti-Bullying Climate.我们需要一个社群:在反欺凌的环境下,学校归属感促使学生不再袖手旁观。
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Sep 1. doi: 10.1007/s10964-025-02249-x.
2
Adolescents' experiences with substance use: risks, protective factors and interventions.青少年的物质使用经历:风险、保护因素及干预措施
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 17;13(1):802. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03125-w.
3
The Reciprocal Relationship between School Connectedness and Adolescent Depressive Symptoms: A Meta-analytic Cross-lagged Panel Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Model Modification in Covariance Structure Modeling: A Comparison among Likelihood Ratio, Lagrange Multiplier, and Wald Tests.协方差结构建模中的模型修正:似然比、拉格朗日乘数和 Wald 检验的比较。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1990 Jan 1;25(1):115-36. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2501_13.
2
The role of peer and adult models for drug taking at different stages in adolescence.同伴和成人榜样在青少年不同阶段吸毒行为中的作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 1980 Oct;9(5):449-65. doi: 10.1007/BF02087681.
3
The social development model: An integrated approach to delinquency prevention.
学校归属感与青少年抑郁症状之间的相互关系:一项元分析交叉滞后面板分析
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1007/s10964-025-02212-w.
4
Cumulative Risk and Cumulative Protection: Relative Contributions to Predicting Substance Use, Antisocial Behaviour and Mental Health Across Development.累积风险与累积保护:对预测不同发展阶段物质使用、反社会行为及心理健康的相对贡献
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2025 Feb;35(1):22-30. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2365. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
5
The German Communities That Care Youth Survey: dimensionality and validity of risk factors.德国社区关爱青年调查:危险因素的维度和有效性。
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 30;12:1472347. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1472347. eCollection 2024.
6
Predictors of Suicidal Ideation and Attempts among LGBTQ Adolescents: The Roles of Help-seeking Beliefs, Peer Victimization, Depressive Symptoms, and Drug Use.LGBTQ青少年自杀意念和自杀未遂的预测因素:求助信念、同伴受害、抑郁症状和药物使用的作用。
J Child Fam Stud. 2019 Sep;28(9):2443-2455. doi: 10.1007/s10826-019-01339-2. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
7
Is nicotine vaping associated with subsequent initiation of cannabis or other substances from adolescence into young adulthood?吸电子烟与从青少年期到青年期随后开始使用大麻或其他物质有关吗?
Am J Epidemiol. 2025 May 7;194(5):1314-1321. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae189.
8
Racial Differences in Biopsychosocial Pathways to Tobacco and Marijuana Use Among Youth.青少年使用烟草和大麻的生物心理社会途径中的种族差异。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 May 28. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02035-8.
9
Investigating the Relative Influence of Romantic Sex Partners and Close Friends on Adolescent Alcohol and Marijuana Use.探究浪漫性关系伴侣和亲密朋友对青少年饮酒和使用大麻的相对影响。
Prev Sci. 2023 May;24(4):676-687. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01536-y. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
10
Psychosocial Correlates of Opioid Use Profiles among Young Adults in a Longitudinal Study across 6 US Metropolitan Areas.6 个美国大都市地区纵向研究中青年人群阿片类药物使用模式的心理社会相关因素。
Subst Use Misuse. 2023;58(8):981-988. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2201839. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
社会发展模式:预防犯罪的综合方法。
J Prim Prev. 1985 Dec;6(2):73-97. doi: 10.1007/BF01325432.
4
Developmental theories of parental contributors to antisocial behavior.父母导致反社会行为的发展理论。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1993 Oct;21(5):493-518. doi: 10.1007/BF00916316.
5
Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy.青春期有限型和终生持续型反社会行为:一种发展分类法。
Psychol Rev. 1993 Oct;100(4):674-701.
6
Drug use and intimate relationships among women and men: separating specific from general effects in prospective data using structural equation models.男女之间的药物使用与亲密关系:使用结构方程模型在前瞻性数据中区分特定效应与一般效应
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994 Jun;62(3):463-76. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.62.3.463.
7
A critique of criminology: toward an integrated structural-Marxist theory of delinquency production.对犯罪学的批判:迈向一种关于犯罪产生的综合结构马克思主义理论
AJS. 1983 Nov;89(3):513-51. doi: 10.1086/227904.
8
Taking account of time lags in causal models.考虑因果模型中的时间滞后。
Child Dev. 1987 Feb;58(1):80-92.
9
The consequences in young adulthood of adolescent drug involvement. An overview.青少年涉毒在成年早期的后果。综述。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1986 Aug;43(8):746-54. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800080032005.
10
Impact of adolescent drug use and social support on problems of young adults: a longitudinal study.青少年药物使用和社会支持对青年成人问题的影响:一项纵向研究。
J Abnorm Psychol. 1988 Feb;97(1):64-75. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.97.1.64.