Qureshi Ahmad S, Shapiro Robert S, Leatherman James W
University of Minnesota, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN 55415, USA.
Intensive Care Med. 2007 Nov;33(11):1907-12. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0841-6. Epub 2007 Sep 1.
To assess whether subtracting the expiratory change in intra-abdominal (bladder) pressure (Delta IAP) from central venous pressure (CVP) provides a reliable estimate of transmural CVP in spontaneously breathing patients with expiratory muscle activity.
Prospective observational study in a medical ICU.
Twenty-four spontaneously breathing patients with central venous and bladder catheters: 18 with no clinical evidence of active expiration (group 1) and 6 with active expiration (group 2).
Patients in group 1 were coached to change their breathing pattern to one of active expiration for several breaths; those in group 2 were asked to sip water through a straw to briefly interrupt active expiration.
During active expiration end-expiratory CVP (uncorrected CVP) and Delta IAP were measured; Delta IAP was subtracted from uncorrected CVP to obtain corrected CVP. End-expiratory CVP during relaxed breathing (best CVP) was assumed to represent the best estimate of transmural CVP. The absolute difference between corrected CVP and best CVP was much less than the difference between uncorrected CVP and best CVP (2.3+/-2.0 vs. 12.5+/-4.7 mmHg).
In patients with active expiration, subtracting Delta IAP from end-expiratory CVP yields a more reliable (and lower) estimate of transmural CVP than does the uncorrected CVP value.
评估在有呼气肌活动的自主呼吸患者中,从中心静脉压(CVP)中减去腹内(膀胱)压的呼气变化量(ΔIAP)是否能可靠地估计跨壁CVP。
在医学重症监护病房进行的前瞻性观察性研究。
24例留置中心静脉导管和膀胱导管的自主呼吸患者,其中18例无主动呼气的临床证据(第1组),6例有主动呼气(第2组)。
指导第1组患者将呼吸模式改变为主动呼气几次;要求第2组患者通过吸管喝水以短暂中断主动呼气。
在主动呼气期间测量呼气末CVP(未校正CVP)和ΔIAP;从未校正CVP中减去ΔIAP以获得校正CVP。假设放松呼吸时的呼气末CVP(最佳CVP)代表跨壁CVP的最佳估计值。校正CVP与最佳CVP之间的绝对差值远小于未校正CVP与最佳CVP之间的差值(2.3±2.0对12.5±4.7 mmHg)。
在有主动呼气的患者中,从呼气末CVP中减去ΔIAP比未校正的CVP值能更可靠(且更低)地估计跨壁CVP。