de Azevedo A C
Departamento de Prática de Saúde Pública, São Paulo, Brasil.
Rev Saude Publica. 1991 Feb;25(1):64-71. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89101991000100013.
Recent literature (up to 1988) on health services assessment in general and especially on hospital service assessment is reviewed, with special attention to its conceptual and methodological aspects. The history of this process is also examined, from the first attempts by the American College of Surgeons, through the Joint Commission for Hospital Accreditation activities up to more recent efforts. The Diagnosis Related Group methodology is commented especially, as well as its more recent complement, the severity of illness indicators. Progress made in this field is briefly examined as in the light of the Brazilian situation. The origins of the growing international concern with this field are enumerated: soaring costs of health services; the recent growth in the number of medical malpractice suits; and the sharp increase in the complexity of health services. The sources of information used in the process, such as immediate observation (case-control type studies), medical records, and summary instruments already in use for payment or financial control purposes, are commented on. Mention is made of the deep influences of the assessment process on practice as in the case of the standardization of practices and procedures, staging of the pathological processes, trajectory-type studies; the utilization of tracer situations, and, finally, the most influential on practice of all these assessment instruments: the diagnosis and treatment protocols, already in wide use in some medical fields such as cancer treatment even in developing countries.
回顾了截至1988年的近期文献,这些文献总体上是关于卫生服务评估的,特别是关于医院服务评估的,特别关注其概念和方法方面。还考察了这一过程的历史,从美国外科医师学会的首次尝试,到医院评审联合委员会的活动,直至最近的努力。特别评论了诊断相关组方法及其最近的补充——疾病严重程度指标。结合巴西的情况简要考察了该领域取得的进展。列举了国际上对该领域日益关注的起源:卫生服务成本飙升;近期医疗事故诉讼数量的增加;以及卫生服务复杂性的急剧上升。对该过程中使用的信息来源进行了评论,如直接观察(病例对照研究类型)、医疗记录以及已经用于支付或财务控制目的的汇总工具。提到了评估过程对实践的深刻影响,例如实践和程序的标准化、病理过程的分期、轨迹类型研究;追踪情况的利用,以及最后,所有这些评估工具中对实践影响最大的:诊断和治疗方案,即使在发展中国家的一些医学领域如癌症治疗中也已广泛使用。