Suppr超能文献

[德国门诊风湿病医疗保健的现状。医疗保健结构与服务范围]

[Current status of ambulatory rheumatologic health care in Germany. Structure of health care and range of services].

作者信息

Mittendorf T, Edelmann E, Kekow J, von Hinüber U, Müller-Brodmann W, Graf von der Schulenburg J-M

机构信息

Forschungsstelle für Gesundheitsökonomie und Gesundheitssystemforschung, Leibniz-Universität Hannover, Königsworther Platz 1, 30167 Hannover, Deutschland.

出版信息

Z Rheumatol. 2007 Oct;66(6):525-32. doi: 10.1007/s00393-007-0189-x.

Abstract

AIM

To gather information on current organizational structures in rheumatologic ambulatory health care in Germany. Based on the results recommendations on future structures will be discussed.

METHODS

This study involved data collection and statistical analysis via a structured 10-page questionnaire among the members of the German Association of Rheumatologists. The questions concerned a variety of topics including information on office structures, patient structure, structure of services offered, co-operation with colleagues and hospitals, quality assurance measures, economic factors, and a subjective assessment of the health care structures in rheumatology by the participants.

RESULTS

Data obtained from 197 rheumatologists who participate in health care were analyzed. In this paper results concerning the organizational as well as the medical ambulatory health care structure will be presented. Data on economic factors will be presented in part 2 of this study.

CONCLUSIONS

The organization of ambulatory treatment regarding processes and treatment differences between office-based physicians and rheumatologic outpatient departments in hospitals was very homogeneous. However, physicians in the eastern regions treated significantly more patients compared with the western parts of Germany. This difference was also observed between the north and south. Differences in patient groups (e.g. underlying diseases) were reported between different sub-groups of rheumatologists (e.g. internal specialists vs. GP vs. orthopedic rheumatologists). Integrated health care, as promoted by German social law, did not play a major role. Overall there was a high level of self-initiated training of physicians and participation in education of patients and other physicians.

摘要

目的

收集德国风湿病门诊医疗当前组织结构的信息。基于研究结果,将讨论对未来结构的建议。

方法

本研究通过向德国风湿病学家协会成员发放一份10页的结构化问卷进行数据收集和统计分析。问题涉及多个主题,包括诊所结构信息、患者结构、所提供服务的结构、与同事及医院的合作、质量保证措施、经济因素,以及参与者对风湿病医疗结构的主观评估。

结果

对197名参与医疗保健的风湿病学家提供的数据进行了分析。本文将展示有关组织以及医疗门诊保健结构的结果。经济因素的数据将在本研究的第二部分呈现。

结论

在门诊治疗的组织方面,诊所医生与医院风湿病门诊之间在流程和治疗差异上非常相似。然而,德国东部地区的医生治疗的患者明显多于西部地区。南北之间也存在这种差异。不同亚组的风湿病学家(如内科专家、全科医生、骨科风湿病学家)报告的患者群体(如基础疾病)存在差异。德国社会法所倡导的综合医疗保健并未发挥主要作用。总体而言,医生的自我培训以及参与患者和其他医生教育的程度较高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验