Sitruk-Ware R
Center for Biomedical Research, Population Council and Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Climacteric. 2007 Oct;10(5):358-70. doi: 10.1080/13697130701609121.
Since the publication of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study followed by the results of the Million Women Study (MWS), the role of hormonal therapy in postmenopausal women has been further challenged. The risks attributed to hormone therapy have been overestimated and the data has been wrongly extrapolated to the whole class of therapies. The trends in postmenopausal hormonal therapy seem now to favor the non-oral delivery routes for both the estrogen and the progestin for women with an intact uterus, based on the assumption that a lesser stimulation of the liver proteins and a neutral metabolic profile would be more favorable in terms of cardiovascular and venous risk. The combination of non-oral administration of estradiol and local delivery of progesterone or a progestin such as levonorgestrel by means of gels, sprays, vaginal rings or intrauterine systems would represent new methods of replacement therapy for the menopausal woman, improving compliance and minimizing the risks of hormone replacement. Several of these systems are either available or in development. Long-term studies on the risk/benefit of various non-oral formulations are certainly warranted.
自妇女健康倡议(WHI)研究发表以及百万妇女研究(MWS)得出结果以来,激素疗法在绝经后女性中的作用受到了进一步质疑。归因于激素疗法的风险被高估,且数据被错误地外推至整个疗法类别。基于肝脏蛋白受刺激较小以及中性代谢谱在心血管和静脉风险方面更有利的假设,绝经后激素疗法目前的趋势似乎倾向于为有完整子宫的女性采用雌激素和孕激素的非口服给药途径。通过凝胶、喷雾剂、阴道环或宫内节育系统非口服给予雌二醇并局部给予孕激素或左炔诺孕酮等孕激素的组合,将代表绝经女性替代疗法的新方法,可提高依从性并将激素替代风险降至最低。其中一些系统已经可用或正在研发中。对各种非口服制剂的风险/益处进行长期研究无疑是必要的。