Carmeli Eli, Bar-Yossef Tamar, Ariav Claudette, Levy Ran, Liebermann Dario G
Physical Therapy Department, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(5):323-9. doi: 10.1080/09638280701265398.
There is limited experimental evidence to support the view that individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) have a deficit in motor control. This work is a first attempt to evaluate their motor coordination.
The study assessed the relationship between cognitive ability and sensorimotor integration. The clinical hypothesis is that adults with ID fall below non-ID adults in motor skills that involve hand-eye coordination.
A group of 42 adults with ID (ID group) was compared to 48 age-matched typical adults (TA) using a mixed experimental design ('Task' as the within-subjects factor and 'Group' as the between-subjects factor). Participants performed the following tests twice: Box-and-Blocks, 25-Grooved-Pegboard, Stick Catching and overhead Beanbag-Throw. Pearson correlations and ANOVAs were used to test the hypothesis (p < or = 0.05).
As expected, TA outperformed the ID group in all tests regardless of the hand used during for the assessment. However, TA individuals scored significantly better with one hand (i.e., the preferred and dominant hand) as opposed to persons with ID, who exhibited no hand preference. Test-retest correlations among the first and second assessment scores yielded moderate-strong coefficients, depending on the type of test (Box-and-Blocks = 0.92 and 0.96, 25-Grooved-Pegboard = 0.69 and 0.83, Stick-Catching = 0.88 and 0.94, Beanbag-Throw = 0.58 and 0.91 for ID and TA, respectively).
Difficulties in the integration of perceptual information into motor action may result in inadequate solutions to daily motor problems. As it stems from our results, intellectual disability relates to inability to integrate visual inputs and hand movements. In people with mild ID such inability is observed using both hands (i.e., they show no hand preferences). Poor perceptual-motor coordination might have a functional significance in that it may lead to exclusion from vocational and recreational activities, and a decreasing competence of ADL. Assessing coordination in adults with ID may contribute to understanding the nature of the ID condition and may encourage an early rehabilitation.
支持智力残疾(ID)个体存在运动控制缺陷这一观点的实验证据有限。本研究首次尝试评估他们的运动协调性。
本研究评估认知能力与感觉运动整合之间的关系。临床假设是,患有ID的成年人在涉及手眼协调的运动技能方面低于非ID成年人。
采用混合实验设计(“任务”作为被试内因素,“组”作为被试间因素),将一组42名患有ID的成年人(ID组)与48名年龄匹配的典型成年人(TA组)进行比较。参与者对以下测试各进行两次:方块搭积木测试、25孔插板测试、抓棍测试和头顶投沙包测试。使用Pearson相关性分析和方差分析来检验假设(p≤0.05)。
正如预期的那样,无论评估时使用哪只手,TA组在所有测试中的表现均优于ID组。然而,与ID组人员不同,TA组个体用一只手(即优势手)得分明显更高,而ID组人员没有表现出手偏好。根据测试类型,第一次和第二次评估分数之间的重测相关性产生了中等至强的系数(ID组和TA组的方块搭积木测试分别为0.92和0.96,25孔插板测试分别为0.69和0.83,抓棍测试分别为0.88和0.94,投沙包测试分别为0.58和0.91)。
将感知信息整合到运动动作中的困难可能导致日常运动问题的解决不充分。根据我们的研究结果,智力残疾与无法整合视觉输入和手部动作有关。在轻度ID患者中,两只手都存在这种无能情况(即他们没有表现出手偏好)。较差的感知 - 运动协调性可能具有功能上的重要意义,因为它可能导致被排除在职业和娱乐活动之外,并降低日常生活活动能力。评估ID成年人的协调性可能有助于理解ID状况的本质,并可能促进早期康复。