Suppr超能文献

氯诺昔康用于体外冲击波碎石术;在镇痛药物使用方面与替诺昔康和安慰剂的比较。

Lornoxicam in extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy; comparison with tenoxicam and placebo in terms of analgesic consumption.

作者信息

Bilir Ayten, Gulec Sacit, Turgut Mehmet, Cetinkaya Dilek, Erkan Ayse, Kurt Imran

机构信息

Departments of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Osmangazi University Medical Faculty, Eskisehir, Turkey.

出版信息

Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2008;42(2):143-7. doi: 10.1080/00365590701225988.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the analgesic efficacy of lornoxicam and compare it with that of tenoxicam in patients undergoing extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for renal stones.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was carried out in a randomized, double-blind fashion and involved 60 patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II) undergoing ESWL who were divided into three groups. Patients in the placebo group (n = 20) received saline and those in the lornoxicam group (n = 20) received lornoxicam 8 mg intravenously 60 min before the procedure. In the tenoxicam group, patients (n = 20) received tenoxicam 20 mg intravenously at the same time point. All patients were started on patient-controlled i.v. meperidine analgesia during the procedure. The effectiveness was assessed by using a visual analog scale (VAS) and by calculating the total analgesic consumption of meperidine during the procedure. Arterial blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and respiratory rate were recorded throughout the procedure; nausea and vomiting, agitation, and respiratory depression were assessed.

RESULTS

Compared with patients in the placebo group, patients in the lornoxicam and tenoxicam groups received smaller doses of meperidine at all time points (p < 0.05). After 30, 45, and 60 min of ESWL, patients in the lornoxicam group required significantly smaller doses of meperidine than those in the tenoxicam group (p < 0.05). Patients in the placebo group showed higher VAS scores than those in the lornoxicam and tenoxicam groups at 15, 30 and 60 min. The VAS score in the lornoxicam group was lower than that in the tenoxicam group at 15, 30, and 45 min, but the difference between the groups was statistically significant only at 45 min (1 and 3, respectively; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing ESWL the i.v. administration of a single dose of 8 mg lornoxicam provides significantly better pain control compared with tenoxicam 20 mg and placebo, without increasing adverse side-effects.

摘要

目的

评估氯诺昔康的镇痛效果,并将其与替诺昔康在接受体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗肾结石的患者中的镇痛效果进行比较。

材料与方法

本研究采用随机、双盲方式,纳入60例接受ESWL治疗的患者(美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级为I-II级),将其分为三组。安慰剂组(n = 20)患者接受生理盐水,氯诺昔康组(n = 20)患者在手术前60分钟静脉注射8毫克氯诺昔康。替诺昔康组患者(n = 20)在同一时间点静脉注射20毫克替诺昔康。所有患者在手术过程中均开始使用患者自控静脉注射哌替啶镇痛。通过视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估效果,并计算手术过程中哌替啶的总镇痛用量。在整个手术过程中记录动脉血压、血氧饱和度和呼吸频率;评估恶心、呕吐、躁动和呼吸抑制情况。

结果

与安慰剂组患者相比,氯诺昔康组和替诺昔康组患者在所有时间点接受的哌替啶剂量均较小(p < 0.05)。ESWL治疗30、45和60分钟后,氯诺昔康组患者所需的哌替啶剂量明显低于替诺昔康组(p < 0.05)。在15、30和60分钟时,安慰剂组患者的VAS评分高于氯诺昔康组和替诺昔康组。氯诺昔康组在15、30和45分钟时的VAS评分低于替诺昔康组,但两组之间的差异仅在45分钟时具有统计学意义(分别为1和3;p < 0.05)。

结论

在接受ESWL治疗的患者中,静脉注射单剂量8毫克氯诺昔康与20毫克替诺昔康和安慰剂相比,能提供明显更好的疼痛控制,且不增加不良反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验