Suppr超能文献

探索综合连线测验的效度。

Exploring the validity of the comprehensive trail making test.

作者信息

Smith Steven R, Servesco Amanda M, Edwards Jordan W, Rahban Roxanna, Barazani Sivan, Nowinski Lisa A, Little Jessica A, Blazer April L, Green Jennifer Greif

机构信息

Department of Counselling, Clinical, and School Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9490, USA.

出版信息

Clin Neuropsychol. 2008 May;22(3):507-18. doi: 10.1080/13854040701399269. Epub 2007 Jun 18.

Abstract

The present study is the first independent investigation of the Comprehensive Trail Making Test (CTMT; Reynolds, 2002) with both clinical and non-clinical samples. We examined convergent and divergent validity by exploring relationships between the CTMT and other measures. Discriminant validity was examined by comparing CTMT scores of non-clinical and clinical groups. Results indicate that the CTMT was largely unrelated to measures of processing speed and nonverbal reasoning, verbal processing, and psychiatric symptoms. The CTMT Composite score was able to differentiate between clinical and non-clinical groups with a large effect size. Overall, although further research is needed, results tentatively suggest that the CTMT may be a useful addition to a multifaceted neuropsychological test battery.

摘要

本研究是首次对综合连线测验(CTMT;雷诺兹,2002)在临床和非临床样本中进行的独立调查。我们通过探索CTMT与其他测量方法之间的关系来检验其聚合效度和区分效度。通过比较非临床组和临床组的CTMT分数来检验判别效度。结果表明,CTMT在很大程度上与加工速度、非言语推理、言语加工和精神症状的测量无关。CTMT综合分数能够以较大的效应量区分临床组和非临床组。总体而言,尽管还需要进一步研究,但结果初步表明,CTMT可能是多方面神经心理测验组合中的一个有用补充。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验