Lipscomb Joseph, Gotay Carolyn C, Snyder Claire F
Rollins School of Publci Health, Emory Universoity, Atlanta, GA, USA.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2007 Sep-Oct;57(5):278-300. doi: 10.3322/CA.57.5.278.
There is growing recognition that patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures--encompassing, for example, health-related quality of life--can complement traditional biomedical outcome measures (eg, survival, disease-free survival) in conveying important information for cancer care decision making. This paper provides an integrated review and interpretation of how PROs have been defined, measured, and used in a range of recent cancer research and policy initiatives. We focus, in turn, on the role of PRO measurement in the evaluation and approval of cancer therapies, the assessment of cancer care in the community, patient-provider decision making in clinical oncology practice, and population surveillance of cancer patients and survivors. The paper concludes with a discussion of future challenges and opportunities in PRO measure development and application, given the advancing state of the science in cancer outcomes measurement and the evolving needs of cancer decision makers at all levels.
人们越来越认识到,患者报告结局(PRO)指标——例如包括与健康相关的生活质量——在为癌症治疗决策提供重要信息方面,可以补充传统的生物医学结局指标(如生存率、无病生存率)。本文对PRO在一系列近期癌症研究和政策举措中是如何被定义、测量和使用的进行了综合综述与解读。我们依次关注PRO测量在癌症治疗评估与批准、社区癌症护理评估、临床肿瘤学实践中患者与提供者决策以及癌症患者和幸存者群体监测中的作用。鉴于癌症结局测量科学的不断进步以及各级癌症决策者不断变化的需求,本文最后讨论了PRO指标开发与应用未来面临的挑战和机遇。