Pelosi Paolo, Chiumello Davide, Severgnini Paolo, De Grandis Cinzia Elisabetta, Landi Laura, Chierichetti Laura Maria, Frigerio Alice, Munaro Marco, Park Gilbert, Chiaranda Maurizio
Department of Environment, Health, and Safety, University of Insubria-Circolo and Fondazione Macchi Hospital, Varese, Italy.
J Crit Care. 2007 Sep;22(3):258-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2006.12.009. Epub 2007 Mar 30.
We assessed the performance of heated wire humidifiers (HWHs), which should avoid water condensation in the circuit.
We evaluated the efficiency of 3 HWHs, MR850 (Fisher & Paykel, Auckland, New Zealand), CONCHATHERM IV (Hudson RCI, Temecula, Calif), and DAR HC 2000 (Mallinckrodt DAR, Mirandola, Italy), in comparison with that of the MR730 heated humidifier (HH), which has a standard circuit. We measured gas temperature and absolute humidity (AH) at the Y piece of the ventilatory circuit using a test lung ventilated at 2 minute ventilation volumes (5 and 15 L/min). Temperature levels at the Y piece of the ventilatory circuit of the HHs were set at 35 degrees C, 37 degrees C, and 39 degrees C with different gradients (-2 degrees C, 0 degrees C, and +2 degrees C) between the outlet chamber and the Y piece of the ventilatory circuit.
At the set temperature levels of 35 degrees C, 37 degrees C, and 39 degrees C with a gradient of 0 degrees C, the MR850 and CONCHATHERM IV had lower gas temperature and AH levels as compared with the DAR HC 2000 and MR730 HH. With increasing temperature gradient, gas temperature increased only with the CONCHATHERM IV but AH increased with all the HWHs. The MR850 showed lower gas temperature and AH levels as compared with CONCHATHERM IV. The condensate was abolished inside the inspiratory circuit with the HWHs.
Heated wire humidifiers eliminate water condensation but present significant differences in gas temperature and AH levels that are lower than the expected settings.
我们评估了加热丝加湿器(HWHs)的性能,这类加湿器应能避免回路中出现水凝结现象。
我们评估了3款加热丝加湿器,分别是MR850(费雪派克医疗保健公司,新西兰奥克兰)、CONCHATHERM IV(哈德逊RCI公司,美国加利福尼亚州特梅库拉)和DAR HC 2000(马利克罗斯特DAR公司,意大利米兰多拉),并与具有标准回路的MR730加热加湿器(HH)进行比较。我们使用测试肺,在2种分钟通气量(5升/分钟和15升/分钟)下进行通气,测量通气回路Y形接头处的气体温度和绝对湿度(AH)。将加热加湿器通气回路Y形接头处的温度水平设置为35摄氏度、37摄氏度和39摄氏度,并使出口腔与通气回路Y形接头之间存在不同的梯度(-2摄氏度、0摄氏度和+2摄氏度)。
在设置温度水平为35摄氏度、37摄氏度和39摄氏度且梯度为0摄氏度时,与DAR HC 2000和MR730加热加湿器相比,MR850和CONCHATHERM IV的气体温度和绝对湿度水平较低。随着温度梯度增加,仅CONCHATHERM IV的气体温度升高,但所有加热丝加湿器的绝对湿度均升高。与CONCHATHERM IV相比,MR850的气体温度和绝对湿度水平较低。加热丝加湿器可消除吸气回路内的凝结水。
加热丝加湿器可消除水凝结现象,但在气体温度和绝对湿度水平方面存在显著差异,且低于预期设置。