Nishida T, Nishimura M, Fujino Y, Mashimo T
Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
J Aerosol Med. 2001 Spring;14(1):43-51. doi: 10.1089/08942680152007882.
Delivering warm, humidified gas to patients is important during mechanical ventilation. Heated humidifiers are effective and popular. The humidifying efficiency is influenced not only by performance and settings of the devices but the settings of ventilator. We compared the efficiency of humidifying devices with a heated wire and servo-controlled function under a variety of ventilator settings. A bench study was done with a TTL model lung. The study took place in the laboratory of the University Hospital, Osaka, Japan. Four devices (MR290 with MR730, MR310 with MR730; both Fisher & Paykel, ConchaTherm IV; Hudson RCI, and HummaxII; METRAN) were tested. Hummax II has been developed recently, and it consists of a heated wire and polyethylene microporous hollow fiber. Both wire and fiber were put inside of an inspiratory circuit, and water vapor is delivered throughout the circuit. The Servo 300 was connected to the TTL with a standard ventilator circuit. The ventilator settings were as follows; minute ventilation (V(E)) 5, 10, and 15 L/min, a respiratory rate of 10 breaths/min, I:E ratio 1:1, 1:2, and 1:4, and no applied PEEP. Humidifying devices were set to maintain the temperature of airway opening at 32 degrees C and 37 degrees C. The greater V(E) the lower the humidity with all devices except Hummax II. Hummax II delivered 100% relative humidity at all ventilator and humidifier settings. When airway temperature control of the devices was set at 32 degrees C, the ConchaTherm IV did not deliver 30 mg/L of vapor, which is the value recommended by American National Standards at all V(E) settings. At 10 and 15 L/min of V(E) settings MR310 with MR730 did not deliver recommended vapor, either. In conclusion, airway temperature setting of the humidifying devices influenced the humidity of inspiratory gas greatly. Ventilatory settings also influenced the humidity of inspiratory gas. The Hummax II delivered sufficient water vapor under a variety of minute ventilation.
在机械通气过程中,为患者输送温暖、湿润的气体非常重要。加热加湿器有效且受欢迎。加湿效率不仅受设备性能和设置的影响,还受呼吸机设置的影响。我们在各种呼吸机设置下比较了具有加热丝和伺服控制功能的加湿设备的效率。使用TTL模型肺进行了一项实验台研究。该研究在日本大阪大学医院的实验室进行。测试了四种设备(费雪派克的MR290与MR730、MR310与MR730;ConchaTherm IV;哈德逊RCI,以及HummaxII;METRAN)。Hummax II是最近开发的,它由加热丝和聚乙烯微孔中空纤维组成。加热丝和纤维都置于吸气回路内,水蒸气通过整个回路输送。Servo 300通过标准呼吸机回路连接到TTL。呼吸机设置如下:分钟通气量(V(E))为5、10和15升/分钟,呼吸频率为10次/分钟,吸呼比为1:1、1:2和1:4,且未施加呼气末正压(PEEP)。加湿设备设置为将气道开口温度维持在32摄氏度和37摄氏度。除Hummax II外,所有设备的V(E)越大,湿度越低。在所有呼吸机和加湿器设置下,Hummax II的相对湿度均为100%。当设备的气道温度控制设置为32摄氏度时,ConchaTherm IV在所有V(E)设置下都无法输送美国国家标准推荐的30毫克/升的水汽。在V(E)设置为10和15升/分钟时,MR310与MR730也无法输送推荐的水汽。总之,加湿设备的气道温度设置对吸入气体的湿度有很大影响。通气设置也会影响吸入气体的湿度。Hummax II在各种分钟通气量下都能输送足够的水汽。