• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Communication and decision making in cancer care: setting research priorities for decision support/patients' decision aids.癌症护理中的沟通与决策:确定决策支持/患者决策辅助工具的研究重点。
Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):626-34. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07306788. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
2
Are patient decision aids the best way to improve clinical decision making? Report of the IPDAS Symposium.患者决策辅助工具是改善临床决策的最佳方式吗?IPDAS研讨会报告。
Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):599-608. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07307272. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
3
Option Grids: shared decision making made easier.选项网格:让共同决策变得更简单。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Feb;90(2):207-12. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.036. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
4
Developing a model of decision-making about complementary therapy use for patients with cancer: a qualitative study.开发一种针对癌症患者使用补充疗法的决策模型:一项定性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Dec;89(3):374-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.11.003. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
5
Linking decision-making research and cancer prevention and control: important themes.将决策研究与癌症预防控制相联系:重要主题。
Health Psychol. 2005 Jul;24(4S):S106-10. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S106.
6
Feasibility and effects of decision aids.决策辅助工具的可行性与效果
Med Decis Making. 2000 Jan-Mar;20(1):112-27. doi: 10.1177/0272989X0002000114.
7
Shared decision-making in diverse health care systems--translating research into practice.不同医疗体系中的共同决策——将研究转化为实践
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Dec;73(3):399-401. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.09.004. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
8
Using Option Grids: steps toward shared decision-making for neonatal circumcision.使用选项网格:迈向新生儿包皮环切术共同决策的步骤
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Feb;99(2):236-42. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.08.025. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
9
Impact of a web-based treatment decision aid for early-stage prostate cancer on shared decision-making and health outcomes: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.基于网络的早期前列腺癌治疗决策辅助工具对共同决策和健康结局的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 May 27;16:231. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0750-x.
10
Supporting patients in shared decision making in clinical practice.在临床实践中支持患者进行共同决策。
Nurs Stand. 2015 Apr 1;29(31):50-7. doi: 10.7748/ns.29.31.50.e8570.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of the Serious Illness Care Program in Outpatient Oncology: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.严重疾病照护计划对门诊肿瘤学的影响:一项群组随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jun 1;179(6):751-759. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0077.
2
Computer-assisted Medical Decision-making System for Diagnosis of Urticaria.用于荨麻疹诊断的计算机辅助医学决策系统
MDM Policy Pract. 2016 Nov 9;1(1):2381468316677752. doi: 10.1177/2381468316677752. eCollection 2016 Jul-Dec.
3
Optimal cancer care: what essential elements of care would help haematological cancer patients obtain and understand information about their disease and its treatment and impact?优化癌症护理:哪些必要的护理要素可以帮助血液癌症患者获取和理解有关其疾病及其治疗和影响的信息?
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Aug;26(8):2843-2849. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4140-2. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
4
Development of the Serious Illness Care Program: a randomised controlled trial of a palliative care communication intervention.重症护理项目的发展:姑息治疗沟通干预的随机对照试验
BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 6;5(10):e009032. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009032.
5
Palliative medicine and decision science: the critical need for a shared agenda to foster informed patient choice in serious illness.缓和医学与决策科学:在重病患者中促进知情选择,迫切需要制定共同议程。
J Palliat Med. 2011 Oct;14(10):1109-16. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0032. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
6
A decision aid to support informed choices about bowel cancer screening among adults with low education: randomised controlled trial.一种支持低教育水平成年人进行结直肠癌筛查的决策辅助工具:随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2010 Oct 26;341:c5370. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5370.
7
Understanding surgery choices for breast cancer: how might the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the Common Sense Model contribute to decision support interventions?理解乳腺癌手术选择:计划行为理论和常识模型如何为决策支持干预做出贡献?
Health Expect. 2011 Mar;14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):6-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00558.x.
8
A longitudinal study of organizational formation, innovation adoption, and dissemination activities within the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network.国家药物滥用治疗临床试验网络内的组织形成、创新采用和传播活动的纵向研究。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Jun;38 Suppl 1:S44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2009.12.008.
9
Patient-provider communication and cancer screening among unmarried women.未婚女性患者与医疗服务提供者之间的沟通及癌症筛查
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Nov;73(2):251-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.030.

本文引用的文献

1
The effectiveness of a primer to help people understand risk: two randomized trials in distinct populations.一种帮助人们理解风险的入门指南的有效性:在不同人群中的两项随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Feb 20;146(4):256-65. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-4-200702200-00004.
2
Cancer communication patterns and the influence of patient characteristics: disparities in information-giving and affective behaviors.癌症沟通模式及患者特征的影响:信息提供与情感行为方面的差异
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Sep;62(3):355-60. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.011. Epub 2006 Jul 24.
3
Numeracy and decision making.算术能力与决策制定。
Psychol Sci. 2006 May;17(5):407-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01720.x.
4
What is perfect health to an 85-year-old?: evidence for scale recalibration in subjective health ratings.对一位85岁的老人来说,完美健康意味着什么?:主观健康评分中尺度重新校准的证据。
Med Care. 2005 Oct;43(10):1054-7. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000178193.38413.70.
5
Reducing the influence of anecdotal reasoning on people's health care decisions: is a picture worth a thousand statistics?减少轶事推理对人们医疗保健决策的影响:一张图片能抵得上一千个统计数据吗?
Med Decis Making. 2005 Jul-Aug;25(4):398-405. doi: 10.1177/0272989X05278931.
6
A communication model of shared decision making: accounting for cancer treatment decisions.一种共同决策的沟通模型:对癌症治疗决策的考量
Health Psychol. 2005 Jul;24(4S):S99-S105. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S99.
7
Advance directives and cancer decision making near the end of life.临终前的预立医疗指示与癌症决策
Health Psychol. 2005 Jul;24(4S):S63-70. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S63.
8
Misimagining the unimaginable: the disability paradox and health care decision making.对不可想象之事的错误想象:残疾悖论与医疗保健决策
Health Psychol. 2005 Jul;24(4S):S57-62. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S57.
9
Decision making as coping.作为应对方式的决策制定
Health Psychol. 2005 Jul;24(4S):S23-8. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S23.
10
Policy support for patient-centered care: the need for measurable improvements in decision quality.以患者为中心的医疗服务的政策支持:决策质量可衡量改善的必要性。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;Suppl Variation:VAR54-62. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.var.54.

癌症护理中的沟通与决策:确定决策支持/患者决策辅助工具的研究重点。

Communication and decision making in cancer care: setting research priorities for decision support/patients' decision aids.

作者信息

Barnato Amber E, Llewellyn-Thomas Hilary A, Peters Ellen M, Siminoff Laura, Collins E Dale, Barry Michael J

机构信息

Center for Research on Health Care, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):626-34. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07306788. Epub 2007 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X07306788
PMID:17873249
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3897262/
Abstract

The following is a summary report from a special symposium titled, "Translating Research into Practice: Setting a Research Agenda for Clinical Decision Tools in Cancer Prevention, Early Detection, and Treatment," that was held on 23 October 2005 in San Francisco at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making (SMDM). The symposium was designed to answer the question: "What are the top 2 research priorities in the field of patients' cancer-related decision aids?" After introductory remarks by Dr. Barry, each of four panelists-Drs. Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas, Ellen Peters, Laura Siminoff, and Dale Collins-addressed the question and provided their rationale during prepared remarks. The moderator, Dr. Michael Barry, then facilitated a discussion between the panelists, with input from the audience, to further explore and add to the various proposed research questions. Finally, Dr. Amber Barnato conducted a simple vote count (see Table 1) to prioritize the panelists' and the audience's recommendations.

摘要

以下是一份特别研讨会的总结报告,该研讨会名为“将研究转化为实践:为癌症预防、早期检测和治疗中的临床决策工具设定研究议程”,于2005年10月23日在旧金山举行的医学决策学会(SMDM)年会上召开。该研讨会旨在回答以下问题:“患者癌症相关决策辅助领域的两大首要研究重点是什么?”在巴里博士进行开场发言后,四位小组成员——希拉里·卢埃林 - 托马斯博士、艾伦·彼得斯博士、劳拉·西米诺夫博士和戴尔·柯林斯博士——分别针对该问题发表了预先准备好的讲话,并阐述了各自的理由。主持人迈克尔·巴里博士随后引导小组成员展开讨论,并听取了观众的意见,以进一步探讨并补充各种提出的研究问题。最后,安伯·巴纳托博士进行了一次简单的投票计数(见表1),以对小组成员和观众的建议进行优先级排序。