Bivins Roberta
History of Medicine, Cardiff University's School of History and Archaeology, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Bull Hist Med. 2007 Fall;81(3):533-68. doi: 10.1353/bhm.2007.0062.
Do the former colonizing powers, like their former colonies, have "postcolonial medicine," and if so, where does it take place, who practices it, and upon whom? How has British medicine in particular responded to the huge cultural shifts represented by the rise of the New Commonwealth and associated postcolonial immigration? I address these questions through a case study of the medical and political responses to vitamin D deficiency among Britain's South Asian communities since the 1960s. My research suggests that in these contexts, diet frequently became a proxy or shorthand for culture (and religion, and race), while disease justified pressure to assimilate.
像其前殖民地一样,前殖民列强是否拥有“后殖民医学”?如果有,它在哪里出现、由谁施行以及针对哪些人?尤其是英国医学如何应对英联邦新成员国的崛起及相关后殖民移民所代表的巨大文化转变?我通过一个案例研究来探讨这些问题,该案例研究自20世纪60年代以来英国南亚社区对维生素D缺乏症的医学和政治反应。我的研究表明,在这些情况下,饮食常常成为文化(以及宗教和种族)的替代物或代名词,而疾病成为了同化压力的正当理由。