• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The association between treatment preferences and trajectories of care at the end-of-life.临终时治疗偏好与护理轨迹之间的关联。
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Nov;22(11):1566-71. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0362-6. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
2
Instability of Willingness to Accept Life-Sustaining Treatments in Patients With Advanced Chronic Organ Failure During 1 Year.晚期慢性器官衰竭患者在1年内接受维持生命治疗意愿的不稳定性
Chest. 2017 May;151(5):1081-1087. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.12.003. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
3
Inconsistency over time in the preferences of older persons with advanced illness for life-sustaining treatment.晚期疾病老年人对维持生命治疗的偏好随时间的不一致性。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Jul;55(7):1007-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01232.x.
4
Changes in preferences for life-sustaining treatment among older persons with advanced illness.晚期疾病老年患者维持生命治疗偏好的变化。
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Apr;22(4):495-501. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0104-9.
5
Physician-patient end-of-life care discussions: correlates and associations with end-of-life care preferences of cancer patients-a cross-sectional survey study.医患临终关怀讨论:与癌症患者临终关怀偏好的相关性及关联——一项横断面调查研究
Palliat Med. 2014 Dec;28(10):1222-30. doi: 10.1177/0269216314540974. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
6
What matters to seriously ill older persons making end-of-life treatment decisions?: A qualitative study.对于做出临终治疗决策的重病老年人来说,什么才是重要的?一项定性研究。
J Palliat Med. 2003 Apr;6(2):237-44. doi: 10.1089/109662103764978489.
7
A call for high-quality advance care planning in outpatients with severe COPD or chronic heart failure.呼吁在患有严重 COPD 或慢性心力衰竭的门诊患者中进行高质量的预先护理计划。
Chest. 2011 May;139(5):1081-1088. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-1753. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
8
A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators.一项改善重症住院患者护理的对照试验。了解治疗结果和风险的预后及偏好研究(SUPPORT)。SUPPORT主要研究者。
JAMA. 1995;274(20):1591-8.
9
High satisfaction and low decisional conflict with advance care planning among chronically ill patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or heart failure using an online decision aid: A pilot study.使用在线决策辅助工具对晚期慢性阻塞性肺疾病或心力衰竭慢性病患者进行预先护理计划的高满意度和低决策冲突:一项试点研究。
Chronic Illn. 2016 Sep;12(3):227-35. doi: 10.1177/1742395316633511. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
10
Informing shared decisions about advance directives for patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a modeling approach.为患有严重慢性阻塞性肺疾病的患者制定预先指示的共同决策:一种建模方法。
Value Health. 2012 Mar-Apr;15(2):357-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.10.015. Epub 2012 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

1
A modular pipeline for natural language processing-screened human abstraction of a pragmatic trial outcome from electronic health records.一种用于自然语言处理的模块化管道——从电子健康记录中筛选出实用试验结果的人工摘要。
medRxiv. 2025 Jun 24:2025.06.23.25330134. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.23.25330134.
2
Exploring and reconciling discordance between documented and preferred resuscitation preferences for hospitalized patients: a quality improvement study.探索并调和住院患者文档记录的复苏偏好与首选复苏偏好之间的差异:一项质量改进研究。
Can J Anaesth. 2021 Apr;68(4):530-540. doi: 10.1007/s12630-020-01906-y. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
3
Discordant Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Code Status at Death.心肺复苏术和死亡时的代码状态不一致。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Apr;61(4):770-780.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.09.015. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
4
Patient-physician discordance in goals of care for patients with advanced cancer.患者与医生在晚期癌症患者的治疗目标上存在分歧。
Curr Oncol. 2019 Dec;26(6):370-379. doi: 10.3747/co.26.5431. Epub 2019 Dec 1.
5
Health-related preferences of older patients with multimorbidity: an evidence map.患有多种疾病的老年患者的健康相关偏好:一项证据图谱
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 15;9(12):e034485. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034485.
6
Conceptualizing and Counting Discretionary Utilization in the Final 100 Days of Life: A Scoping Review.临终前100天内自由裁量医疗利用的概念化与计数:一项范围综述
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Apr;59(4):894-915.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.10.009. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
7
The State of the Science on Integrating Palliative Care in Heart Failure.心力衰竭中整合姑息治疗的科学现状
J Palliat Med. 2017 Jun;20(6):592-603. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0178. Epub 2017 May 12.
8
Respecting Choices and Related Models of Advance Care Planning: A Systematic Review of Published Evidence.尊重选择与预先护理计划的相关模式:已发表证据的系统评价
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Jun;35(6):897-907. doi: 10.1177/1049909117745789. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
9
Care Consistency With Documented Care Preferences: Methodologic Considerations for Implementing the "Measuring What Matters" Quality Indicator.与记录的护理偏好的护理一致性:实施“衡量重要事项”质量指标的方法学考量
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Oct;52(4):453-458. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.04.015. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
10
Quality of Life, Mood, and Prognostic Understanding in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer.转移性乳腺癌患者的生活质量、情绪和预后理解。
J Palliat Med. 2016 Aug;19(8):863-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0027. Epub 2016 Apr 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Prospective study of health status preferences and changes in preferences over time in older adults.老年人健康状况偏好及偏好随时间变化的前瞻性研究。
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Apr 24;166(8):890-5. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.8.890.
2
The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review.替代决策者的准确性:一项系统综述。
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Mar 13;166(5):493-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.5.493.
3
Factors influencing death at home in terminally ill patients with cancer: systematic review.影响癌症晚期患者在家中死亡的因素:系统评价
BMJ. 2006 Mar 4;332(7540):515-21. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38740.614954.55. Epub 2006 Feb 8.
4
The family perspective of ESRD deaths.终末期肾病死亡的家庭视角。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2005 Jan;45(1):154-61. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2004.09.014.
5
Perspectives, preferences, care practices, and outcomes among older and middle-aged patients with late-stage cancer.老年和中年晚期癌症患者的观点、偏好、护理实践及结果
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Dec 15;22(24):4907-17. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.050. Epub 2004 Nov 1.
6
Enough. The failure of the living will.够了。生前预嘱的失败。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2004 Mar-Apr;34(2):30-42.
7
Facing up to the inevitable, in search of a good death.直面不可避免之事,探寻善终之道。
N Y Times Web. 2003 Dec 30:F5, F6.
8
Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care.家属对临终关怀最后场所的看法。
JAMA. 2004 Jan 7;291(1):88-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.1.88.
9
STUDIES OF ILLNESS IN THE AGED. THE INDEX OF ADL: A STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTION.老年人疾病研究。日常生活活动能力指数:生物和心理社会功能的标准化测量方法。
JAMA. 1963 Sep 21;185:914-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016.
10
What matters to seriously ill older persons making end-of-life treatment decisions?: A qualitative study.对于做出临终治疗决策的重病老年人来说,什么才是重要的?一项定性研究。
J Palliat Med. 2003 Apr;6(2):237-44. doi: 10.1089/109662103764978489.

临终时治疗偏好与护理轨迹之间的关联。

The association between treatment preferences and trajectories of care at the end-of-life.

作者信息

Cosgriff JoAnne Alissi, Pisani Margaret, Bradley Elizabeth H, O'Leary John R, Fried Terri R

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Nov;22(11):1566-71. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0362-6. Epub 2007 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-007-0362-6
PMID:17874168
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2219807/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Honoring patients' treatment preferences is a key component of high-quality end-of-life care.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association of preferences with end-of-life care.

DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

118 community-dwelling persons age > or = 65 years with advanced disease who died in a study which prospectively assessed treatment preferences.

MEASUREMENTS

End-of-life care was categorized according to four pathways: (1) relief of symptoms only, (2) limited attempt to reverse acute process with rapid change to symptomatic relief, (3) more intensive attempt to reverse acute process with eventual change to symptomatic relief, and (4) highly intensive attempt to reverse acute process with no change in goal.

RESULTS

Adjusting for diagnosis, those with greater willingness to undergo intensive treatment (defined as a desire for invasive therapies despite > or = 50% chance of death) were significantly more likely to receive care with an initial goal of life prolongation (pathways 2-4) [odds ratio 4.73 (95% confidence interval 1.39-16.08)] than those with lower willingness. Nonetheless, mismatches between preferences and pathways were frequent. Only 1 of 27 participants (4%) with lower willingness to undergo intensive treatment received highly intensive intervention (pathway 4); 53 of 91 participants (58%) with greater willingness to undergo intensive treatment received symptom control only (pathway 1).

CONCLUSIONS

The association between preferences and trajectories of end-of-life care suggests that preferences are used to guide treatment decision-making. In contrast to concerns that patients are receiving unwanted aggressive care, mismatches between preferences and trajectories were more frequently in the direction of patients receiving less aggressive care than they are willing to undergo.

摘要

背景

尊重患者的治疗偏好是高质量临终关怀的关键组成部分。

目的

确定偏好与临终关怀之间的关联。

设计

观察性队列研究。

参与者

118名年龄≥65岁、患有晚期疾病的社区居民,他们在一项前瞻性评估治疗偏好的研究中死亡。

测量

临终关怀根据四种途径进行分类:(1)仅缓解症状;(2)有限地尝试扭转急性病程并迅速转向症状缓解;(3)更积极地尝试扭转急性病程并最终转向症状缓解;(4)高度积极地尝试扭转急性病程且目标不变。

结果

在对诊断进行调整后,那些更愿意接受强化治疗的患者(定义为尽管死亡几率≥50%仍希望接受侵入性治疗)比那些意愿较低的患者更有可能接受以延长生命为初始目标的护理(途径2 - 4)[比值比4.73(95%置信区间1.39 - 16.08)]。尽管如此,偏好与途径之间的不匹配情况很常见。在27名意愿较低接受强化治疗的参与者中,只有l名(4%)接受了高度强化干预(途径4);在91名意愿较高接受强化治疗的参与者中,53名(58%)仅接受了症状控制(途径1)。

结论

偏好与临终关怀轨迹之间的关联表明,偏好被用于指导治疗决策。与担心患者接受不必要的积极治疗相反,偏好与轨迹之间的不匹配更多地表现为患者接受的积极治疗比他们愿意接受的少。