Suppr超能文献

临终时治疗偏好与护理轨迹之间的关联。

The association between treatment preferences and trajectories of care at the end-of-life.

作者信息

Cosgriff JoAnne Alissi, Pisani Margaret, Bradley Elizabeth H, O'Leary John R, Fried Terri R

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Nov;22(11):1566-71. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0362-6. Epub 2007 Sep 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Honoring patients' treatment preferences is a key component of high-quality end-of-life care.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association of preferences with end-of-life care.

DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

118 community-dwelling persons age > or = 65 years with advanced disease who died in a study which prospectively assessed treatment preferences.

MEASUREMENTS

End-of-life care was categorized according to four pathways: (1) relief of symptoms only, (2) limited attempt to reverse acute process with rapid change to symptomatic relief, (3) more intensive attempt to reverse acute process with eventual change to symptomatic relief, and (4) highly intensive attempt to reverse acute process with no change in goal.

RESULTS

Adjusting for diagnosis, those with greater willingness to undergo intensive treatment (defined as a desire for invasive therapies despite > or = 50% chance of death) were significantly more likely to receive care with an initial goal of life prolongation (pathways 2-4) [odds ratio 4.73 (95% confidence interval 1.39-16.08)] than those with lower willingness. Nonetheless, mismatches between preferences and pathways were frequent. Only 1 of 27 participants (4%) with lower willingness to undergo intensive treatment received highly intensive intervention (pathway 4); 53 of 91 participants (58%) with greater willingness to undergo intensive treatment received symptom control only (pathway 1).

CONCLUSIONS

The association between preferences and trajectories of end-of-life care suggests that preferences are used to guide treatment decision-making. In contrast to concerns that patients are receiving unwanted aggressive care, mismatches between preferences and trajectories were more frequently in the direction of patients receiving less aggressive care than they are willing to undergo.

摘要

背景

尊重患者的治疗偏好是高质量临终关怀的关键组成部分。

目的

确定偏好与临终关怀之间的关联。

设计

观察性队列研究。

参与者

118名年龄≥65岁、患有晚期疾病的社区居民,他们在一项前瞻性评估治疗偏好的研究中死亡。

测量

临终关怀根据四种途径进行分类:(1)仅缓解症状;(2)有限地尝试扭转急性病程并迅速转向症状缓解;(3)更积极地尝试扭转急性病程并最终转向症状缓解;(4)高度积极地尝试扭转急性病程且目标不变。

结果

在对诊断进行调整后,那些更愿意接受强化治疗的患者(定义为尽管死亡几率≥50%仍希望接受侵入性治疗)比那些意愿较低的患者更有可能接受以延长生命为初始目标的护理(途径2 - 4)[比值比4.73(95%置信区间1.39 - 16.08)]。尽管如此,偏好与途径之间的不匹配情况很常见。在27名意愿较低接受强化治疗的参与者中,只有l名(4%)接受了高度强化干预(途径4);在91名意愿较高接受强化治疗的参与者中,53名(58%)仅接受了症状控制(途径1)。

结论

偏好与临终关怀轨迹之间的关联表明,偏好被用于指导治疗决策。与担心患者接受不必要的积极治疗相反,偏好与轨迹之间的不匹配更多地表现为患者接受的积极治疗比他们愿意接受的少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验