• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者与医生在晚期癌症患者的治疗目标上存在分歧。

Patient-physician discordance in goals of care for patients with advanced cancer.

机构信息

Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH.

Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2019 Dec;26(6):370-379. doi: 10.3747/co.26.5431. Epub 2019 Dec 1.

DOI:10.3747/co.26.5431
PMID:31896935
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6927789/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Shared decision-making at end of life (eol) requires discussions about goals of care and prioritization of length of life compared with quality of life. The purpose of the present study was to describe patient and oncologist discordance with respect to goals of care and to explore possible predictors of discordance.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic cancer and their oncologists completed an interview at study enrolment and every 3 months thereafter until the death of the patient or the end of the study period (15 months). All interviewees used a 100-point visual analog scale to represent their current goals of care, with quality of life (scored as 0) and survival (scored as 100) serving as anchors. Discordance was defined as an absolute difference between patient and oncologist goals of care of 40 points or more.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 378 patients and 11 oncologists. At baseline, 24% discordance was observed, and for patients who survived, discordance was 24% at their last interview. For patients who died, discordance was 28% at the last interview before death, with discordance having been 70% at enrolment. Dissatisfaction with eol care was reported by 23% of the caregivers for patients with discordance at baseline and by 8% of the caregivers for patients who had no discordance ( = 0.049; ϕ = 0.20).

CONCLUSIONS

The data indicate the presence of significant ongoing oncologist-patient discordance with respect to goals of care. Early use of a simple visual analog scale to assess goals of care can inform the oncologist about the patient's goals and lead to delivery of care that is aligned with patient goals.

摘要

背景

生命末期(eol)的共同决策需要讨论医疗护理目标,并对生命长度与生活质量进行优先级排序。本研究的目的是描述患者和肿瘤医生在医疗护理目标方面的不一致,并探讨可能导致不一致的预测因素。

方法

患有转移性癌症的患者及其肿瘤医生在研究入组时以及此后每 3 个月进行一次访谈,直至患者死亡或研究期结束(15 个月)。所有受访者均使用 100 点视觉模拟量表来表示他们当前的医疗护理目标,其中生活质量(得分为 0)和生存(得分为 100)作为参考。差异定义为患者和肿瘤医生的医疗护理目标绝对差值为 40 分或以上。

结果

该研究共纳入 378 名患者和 11 名肿瘤医生。在基线时,观察到 24%的差异,对于存活的患者,在最后一次访谈时差异为 24%。对于死亡的患者,在死亡前的最后一次访谈中差异为 28%,在入组时差异为 70%。在基线存在差异的患者中,有 23%的护理人员对生命末期护理不满意,而无差异的患者中,有 8%的护理人员不满意(=0.049;ϕ=0.20)。

结论

数据表明,在医疗护理目标方面,肿瘤医生和患者之间存在显著的持续不一致。早期使用简单的视觉模拟量表评估医疗护理目标,可以让肿瘤医生了解患者的目标,并提供与患者目标一致的护理。

相似文献

1
Patient-physician discordance in goals of care for patients with advanced cancer.患者与医生在晚期癌症患者的治疗目标上存在分歧。
Curr Oncol. 2019 Dec;26(6):370-379. doi: 10.3747/co.26.5431. Epub 2019 Dec 1.
2
Association between strong patient-oncologist agreement regarding goals of care and aggressive care at end-of-life for patients with advanced cancer.晚期癌症患者的医患双方对治疗目标的强烈一致性与临终时积极治疗之间的关系。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Nov;28(11):5139-5146. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05352-w. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
3
Beliefs About Advanced Cancer Curability in Older Patients, Their Caregivers, and Oncologists.关于晚期癌症可治愈性的信念:老年患者、其照顾者和肿瘤医生的观点。
Oncologist. 2019 Jun;24(6):e292-e302. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0890. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
4
Association Between Caregiver-Oncologist Discordance in Patient's Life Expectancy Estimates and Caregiver Perceived Autonomy Support by the Oncologist.照顾者与肿瘤医生对患者预期寿命的估计不一致与照顾者感知到的肿瘤医生的自主性支持之间的关系。
Oncologist. 2021 Nov;26(11):e1992-e2001. doi: 10.1002/onco.13913. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
5
Actual and Missed Opportunities for End-of-Life Care Discussions With Oncology Patients: A Qualitative Study.终末期癌症患者的生存机会和错失的生存机会:一项定性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2113193. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13193.
6
Determinants of Patient-Oncologist Prognostic Discordance in Advanced Cancer.晚期癌症患者与肿瘤学家预后判断不一致的决定因素
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Nov 1;2(11):1421-1426. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1861.
7
REMAP: A Framework for Goals of Care Conversations.REMAP:照护目标对话框架
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Oct;13(10):e844-e850. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.018796. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
8
Associations of Caregiver-Oncologist Discordance in Prognostic Understanding With Caregiver-Reported Therapeutic Alliance and Anxiety.照顾者与肿瘤学家在预后理解上的不一致与照顾者报告的治疗联盟及焦虑之间的关联。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Jul;60(1):20-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.02.005. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
9
Discrepancy between treatment goals documentation by oncologists and their understanding among cancer patients under active treatment with chemotherapy.肿瘤学家记录的治疗目标与正在接受化疗积极治疗的癌症患者对这些目标的理解之间存在差异。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Mar;28(2):e12973. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12973. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
10
Perceived Barriers to Goals of Care Discussions With Patients With Advanced Cancer and Their Families in the Ambulatory Setting: A Multicenter Survey of Oncologists.门诊环境中与晚期癌症患者及其家属进行照护目标讨论的认知障碍:肿瘤学家的多中心调查
J Palliat Care. 2018 Jul;33(3):125-142. doi: 10.1177/0825859718762287. Epub 2018 Apr 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences between physician and patient preferences for cancer treatments: a systematic review.医生和患者对癌症治疗偏好的差异:系统评价。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Nov 18;23(1):1126. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11598-4.
2
Stigma of Palliative Care among Patients with Advanced Cancer and Their Caregivers on Early Palliative Care.晚期癌症患者及其照护者对早期姑息治疗的姑息治疗污名化
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 18;15(14):3656. doi: 10.3390/cancers15143656.
3
Willingness of patients with cancer pain to participate in end-of-life decisions: a multi-center cross-sectional study from three coastal provinces in southern China.癌症疼痛患者参与临终决策意愿的多中心横断面研究:来自中国南部三个沿海省份。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Nov 26;21(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01108-x.
4
Barriers of and strategies for shared decision-making implementation in the care of metastatic breast cancer: A qualitative study among patients and healthcare professionals in an Asian country.转移性乳腺癌护理中共同决策实施的障碍和策略:在亚洲国家的患者和医疗保健专业人员中进行的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Dec;25(6):2837-2850. doi: 10.1111/hex.13590. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
5
Helping Patients Communicate With Oncologists When Cancer Treatment Resistance Occurs to Develop, Test, and Implement a Patient Communication Aid: Sequential Collaborative Mixed Methods Study.当癌症治疗出现耐药时帮助患者与肿瘤学家沟通:开发、测试和实施患者沟通辅助工具的序贯协作混合方法研究。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jan 12;11(1):e26414. doi: 10.2196/26414.
6
Association Between Caregiver-Oncologist Discordance in Patient's Life Expectancy Estimates and Caregiver Perceived Autonomy Support by the Oncologist.照顾者与肿瘤医生对患者预期寿命的估计不一致与照顾者感知到的肿瘤医生的自主性支持之间的关系。
Oncologist. 2021 Nov;26(11):e1992-e2001. doi: 10.1002/onco.13913. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
7
Videoconference Intervention for Distance Caregivers of Patients With Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.视频会议干预对癌症患者远程照护者的影响:一项随机对照试验。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Jan;17(1):e26-e35. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00576.
8
Oncologist and Patient Preferences for Attributes of CDK4/6 Inhibitor Regimens for the Treatment of Advanced/Metastatic HR Positive/HER2 Negative Breast Cancer: Discrete Choice Experiment and Best-Worst Scaling.肿瘤学家和患者对用于治疗晚期/转移性激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性乳腺癌的细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6(CDK4/6)抑制剂方案属性的偏好:离散选择实验和最佳-最差标度法
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Nov 5;14:2201-2214. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S254934. eCollection 2020.
9
Marital status impacts survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a population-based, propensity-matched study.婚姻状况对上尿路尿路上皮癌患者的生存有影响:一项基于人群的倾向匹配研究。
Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Aug;9(4):1611-1629. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-605.

本文引用的文献

1
Communicating prognosis of patients with advanced cancer between health care providers: a tertiary cancer center review of written correspondence.医疗服务提供者之间就晚期癌症患者的预后情况进行沟通:一家三级癌症中心对书面通信的回顾。
Ann Palliat Med. 2018 Oct;7(4):404-410. doi: 10.21037/apm.2018.06.02. Epub 2018 Jun 16.
2
Tailoring and evaluating an intervention to improve shared decision-making among seniors with dementia, their caregivers, and healthcare providers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.定制和评估一项干预措施以改善老年痴呆症患者、其护理人员和医疗服务提供者之间的共同决策:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Jun 25;19(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2697-1.
3
Facilitators and Barriers to Oncologists' Conduct of Goals of Care Conversations.肿瘤学家进行照护目标沟通的促进因素与障碍
J Palliat Care. 2018 Jul;33(3):143-148. doi: 10.1177/0825859718777361. Epub 2018 May 23.
4
Perceived Barriers to Goals of Care Discussions With Patients With Advanced Cancer and Their Families in the Ambulatory Setting: A Multicenter Survey of Oncologists.门诊环境中与晚期癌症患者及其家属进行照护目标讨论的认知障碍:肿瘤学家的多中心调查
J Palliat Care. 2018 Jul;33(3):125-142. doi: 10.1177/0825859718762287. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
5
Goals of Care and End of Life in the ICU.重症监护病房的照护目标与生命末期
Surg Clin North Am. 2017 Dec;97(6):1275-1290. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
6
Oncologists' and Patients' Perceptions of Initial, Intermediate, and Final Goals of Care Conversations.肿瘤医生和患者对初始、中期和终期医疗照护目标对话的看法。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Mar;55(3):890-896. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.09.024. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
7
Meaningful Communication Before Death, but Not Present at the Time of Death Itself, Is Associated With Better Outcomes on Measures of Depression and Complicated Grief Among Bereaved Family Members of Cancer Patients.在癌症患者的家属丧亲后,有意义的临终前沟通,但不是在死亡发生时进行,与抑郁和复杂悲痛的测量结果的改善相关。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Sep;54(3):273-279. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
8
A Research Agenda for Communication Between Health Care Professionals and Patients Living With Serious Illness.医疗专业人员与重病患者沟通的研究议程。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Sep 1;177(9):1361-1366. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.2005.
9
Speaking Up: How Patient and Physician Voices Shaped a Trial to Improve Goals-of-Care Discussions.直言不讳:患者和医生的声音如何塑造了一项改善目标关怀讨论的试验。
Patient. 2017 Aug;10(4):489-501. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0226-z.
10
Decision Making Regarding the Place of End-of-Life Cancer Care: The Burden on Bereaved Families and Related Factors.关于终末期癌症护理地点的决策:丧亲家庭的负担及相关因素
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 May;53(5):862-870. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.348. Epub 2017 Feb 9.