Thompson Helen M, Maus Christian
Central Science Laboratory, Sand Hutton, York, UK.
Pest Manag Sci. 2007 Nov;63(11):1058-61. doi: 10.1002/ps.1458.
The option of an evaluation and assessment of possible sublethal effects of pesticides on bees has been a subject of discussion by scientists and regulatory authorities. Effects considered included learning behaviour and orientation capacity. This discussion was enhanced by the French bee issue and allegations against systemic insecticides that were linked to the hypothesis that sublethal intoxication might even have led to reported colony losses. This paper considers whether and, if so, how sublethal effects should be incorporated into risk assessment, by addressing a number of questions: What is meant by a sublethal effect? Which sublethal effects should be measured, when and how? How are sublethal effects to be included in risk assessments? The authors conclude that sublethal studies may be helpful as an optional test to address particular, compound-specific concerns, as a lower-tier alternative to semi-field or field testing, if the effects are shown to be ecologically relevant. However, available higher-tier data (semi-field, field tests) should make any additional sublethal testing unnecessary, and higher-tier data should always override data of lower-tier trials on sublethal effects.
对农药对蜜蜂可能产生的亚致死效应进行评估的选项,一直是科学家和监管机构讨论的主题。所考虑的效应包括学习行为和定向能力。法国的蜜蜂问题以及对系统性杀虫剂的指控加剧了这一讨论,这些指控与亚致死中毒甚至可能导致报告的蜂群损失这一假设有关。本文通过解决一系列问题来探讨是否以及如何将亚致死效应纳入风险评估:亚致死效应是什么意思?应该测量哪些亚致死效应、何时测量以及如何测量?如何将亚致死效应纳入风险评估?作者得出结论,如果亚致死效应被证明具有生态相关性,那么亚致死研究作为一种可选测试,有助于解决特定的、化合物特异性的问题,作为半田间或田间试验的低层级替代方法。然而,现有的高层级数据(半田间、田间试验)应使任何额外的亚致死测试变得不必要,并且高层级数据应始终优先于低层级试验的亚致死效应数据。