Chair in Public Health Policy, Discipline of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Int J Equity Health. 2007 Sep 21;6:11. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-6-11.
In 2001, the Government of Thailand introduced a universal coverage scheme with the aim of ensuring equitable health care access for even the poorest citizens. For a flat user fee of 30 Baht per consultation, or for free for those falling into exemption categories, every scheme participant may access registered health services. The exemption categories include children under 12 years of age, senior citizens aged 60 years and over, the very poor, and volunteer health workers. The functioning of these exemption mechanisms and the effect of the scheme on health service utilisation among the poor is controversial.
This cross-sectional study investigated the prevalence of 30-Baht Scheme registration and subsequent self-reported health service utilisation among an urban poor population in the Teparuk community within the Mitrapap slum in Khon Kaen city, northeastern Thailand. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the exemption mechanisms in reaching the very poor and the elderly was examined. Factors for users' choice of health facilities were identified.
Overall, the proportion of the Teparuk community enrolled with the 30-Baht Scheme was high at 86%, with over one quarter of these exempted from paying the consultation fee. User fee exemption was significantly more frequent among households with an above-poverty-line income (64.7%) compared to those below the poverty line (35.3%), chi2 (df) = 5.251 (1); p-value = 0.018. In addition, one third of respondents over 60 years of age were found to be still paying user fees. Self-reported use of registered medical facilities in case of illness was stated to be predominantly due to the service being available through the scheme, with service quality not a chief consideration. Overall consumer satisfaction was high, especially among those not required to pay the 30 Baht user fee.
Whilst the 30-Baht Scheme seems to cover most of the poor population of Mitrapap slum in Khon Kaen, the user fee exemption mechanism only works partially with regard to reaching the poorest and exempting senior citizens. Service utilisation and satisfaction are highest amongst those who are fee-exempt. Service quality was not an important factor influencing choice of health facility. Ways should be sought to improve the effectiveness of the current exemption mechanisms.
2001 年,泰国政府推出了一项全民覆盖计划,旨在确保最贫困的公民都能公平地获得医疗保健。每位计划参与者只需支付 30 铢的门诊费,或免费为符合豁免类别的人群提供服务,即可获得注册的医疗服务。豁免类别包括 12 岁以下的儿童、60 岁及以上的老年人、赤贫者和志愿卫生工作者。这些豁免机制的运作情况以及该计划对贫困人口卫生服务利用的影响存在争议。
本横断面研究调查了泰国东北部孔敬市 Mitrapap 贫民窟内 Teparuk 社区的城市贫困人口中,30 铢计划注册的流行率以及随后的自我报告的卫生服务利用情况。此外,还研究了豁免机制对最贫困和老年人的有效性。确定了用户选择卫生机构的因素。
总体而言,Teparuk 社区的参保率很高,达到 86%,其中超过四分之一的人免交咨询费。收入高于贫困线的家庭(64.7%)比收入低于贫困线的家庭(35.3%)更频繁地获得用户费用豁免,χ2(df)=5.251(1);p 值=0.018。此外,三分之一的 60 岁以上的受访者被发现仍在缴纳用户费用。自述在患病时使用注册医疗设施主要是因为该服务是通过该计划提供的,服务质量不是主要考虑因素。总体消费者满意度很高,特别是在那些不需要支付 30 铢用户费用的人中。
尽管 30 铢计划似乎覆盖了孔敬市 Mitrapap 贫民窟的大部分贫困人口,但用户费用豁免机制在覆盖最贫困人群和豁免老年人方面仅部分有效。费用豁免的人群的服务利用率和满意度最高。服务质量不是影响卫生机构选择的重要因素。应寻求改进当前豁免机制的有效性。