Ikai Tomoki, Yamtree Saowalak, Takemoto Takuji, Tamura Taro, Kanayama Hitomi, Sato Kazuhiro, Kusaka Yukinori, Hayashi Hiroyuki, Terasawa Hidekazu
Division of Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, 23-3 Matsuoka-shimoaizuki, Eiheiji-cho, Yoshida-gun, Fukui, 9101193, Japan.
Faculty of Nursing, College of Asian Scholars, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Jan 5;15:2. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0292-6.
Health care is generally considered to be more highly valued in urban areas than in rural areas. However, studies have reported that there is no difference in the health care values of urban and rural areas in the Kingdom of Thailand, with some studies even indicating that these values are stronger in rural areas. We, therefore, conducted interviews and implemented a qualitative investigation and analysis aimed at elucidating ideals relating to the medical environment among the Kingdom's urban and rural citizens.
The study targeted Thai citizens residing in urban and rural areas. The city of Khon Kaen, located in Khon Kaen Province in northeastern Thailand, was selected as the urban area for the study. We selected Donyang village, located in the same province, as the rural study area. In July 2014, we conducted semi-structured group interviews, applying the Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) analytical approach.
We interviewed ten people in Khon Kaen (the urban area) and seven people from Donyang village (the rural area). Five major and distinctive themes emerged from the interviews. These were: locally appropriate standards of medical care, support for local lifestyles, satisfaction with local medical personnel, healthy lifestyles that do not rely on medical services, and desire for regional autonomy/desire to serve the region in terms of medical care. All of these themes were evident in both study areas. Thus, rather than relying on advanced medical services, both urban and rural Thai citizens expressed the desire to continue living within communities (considered as "families"), contributing to them, and tending to all of their health care needs within their communities.
This study revealed five common themes relating to forms of medical care regarded as ideal among urban and rural citizens of Thailand. Its findings could potentially have important implications for areas characterized by urban-rural inequities relating to the accessibility and utilization of medical services.
一般认为,医疗保健在城市地区比农村地区更受重视。然而,有研究报告称,泰国城乡地区的医疗保健价值观并无差异,甚至有一些研究表明农村地区的这些价值观更强。因此,我们进行了访谈,并开展了定性调查与分析,旨在阐明泰国城乡居民对医疗环境的理想看法。
该研究以居住在泰国城乡地区的公民为对象。位于泰国东北部孔敬府的孔敬市被选为城市研究区域。我们选择了同一省份的董扬村作为农村研究区域。2014年7月,我们采用建构主义扎根理论(CGT)分析方法进行了半结构化小组访谈。
我们采访了孔敬市(城市地区)的10人以及董扬村(农村地区)的7人。访谈中出现了五个主要且独特的主题。它们分别是:适合当地的医疗保健标准、对当地生活方式的支持、对当地医务人员的满意度不依赖医疗服务的健康生活方式,以及在医疗保健方面对区域自治的渴望/为地区服务的愿望。所有这些主题在两个研究区域都很明显。因此,泰国城乡居民都表示,他们希望继续生活在社区(视为“家庭”)中,为社区做出贡献,并在社区内满足自己所有的医疗保健需求,而不是依赖先进的医疗服务。
本研究揭示了泰国城乡居民认为理想的医疗保健形式的五个共同主题。其研究结果可能对存在医疗服务可及性和利用方面城乡不平等问题的地区具有重要意义。