Su Kuan-Pin, Chiu Tsan-Hung, Huang Chieh-Liang, Ho Ming, Lee Chieh-Chung, Wu Po-Lun, Lin Cher-Yeang, Liau Chun-Hui, Liao Chin-Chih, Chiu Wei-Che, Pariante Carmine M
Department of Psychiatry, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2007 Sep-Oct;29(5):436-41. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2007.05.005.
Validating self-reported questionnaires to detect depression during pregnancy, compared to depression during postpartum, has gained much less attention. Furthermore, it is unknown whether it is appropriate to use the same cutoff point to detect depression on different trimesters of pregnancy. The aims of this study, conducted in pregnant Taiwanese women, were: (a) to validate the Taiwanese version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS-T) and the second edition of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II); (b) to compare the EPDS-T and the BDI-II on their validity in detecting depression; and (c) to determine if these scales have different cutoff points in detecting major depressive disorder for different trimesters.
One hundred eighty-five pregnant Taiwanese women who completed the EPDS-T and the BDI-II were interviewed by psychiatrists with the structural interview Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) to establish a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition diagnosis of major depressive disorder. We analyzed and compared the sensitivity, specificity and validity of the EPDS-T and the BDI-II against the MINI diagnosis on the second and third trimesters.
We identified 12/13 as the optimal cutoff of the EPDS-T, at which the sensitivity of the scale was 83% and the specificity was 89%. The optimal cutoff of the BDI-II was 11/12, at which the sensitivity of the scale was 74% and the specificity was 83%. The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic analysis was 0.92 for the EPDS-T and 0.84 for the BDI. There exist different optimal cutoff points of the EPDS-T for detecting major depression during different trimesters: 13/14 for the second trimester and 12/13 for the third trimester. No different optimal cutoff point for the BDI-II was found for different trimesters.
The EPDS-T has satisfactory sensitivity and specificity and better validity than the BDI-II for detecting major depressive disorder during pregnancy in pregnant Taiwanese women. We suggest that more studies with larger sample sizes be performed to confirm if there exist different cutoff points in detecting depression for different trimesters of gestation.
与产后抑郁相比,验证用于检测孕期抑郁的自填式问卷受到的关注要少得多。此外,在孕期不同阶段使用相同的临界值来检测抑郁是否合适尚不清楚。本研究针对台湾孕妇开展,旨在:(a)验证台湾版爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS-T)和贝克抑郁量表第二版(BDI-II);(b)比较EPDS-T和BDI-II在检测抑郁方面的有效性;(c)确定这些量表在检测不同孕期的重度抑郁症时是否有不同的临界值。
185名完成EPDS-T和BDI-II的台湾孕妇接受了精神科医生采用定式访谈工具迷你国际神经精神访谈(MINI)进行的访谈,以确立《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版的重度抑郁症诊断。我们分析并比较了EPDS-T和BDI-II相对于MINI诊断在孕中期和孕晚期的敏感性、特异性和有效性。
我们确定EPDS-T的最佳临界值为12/13,此时该量表的敏感性为83%,特异性为89%。BDI-II的最佳临界值为11/12,此时该量表的敏感性为74%,特异性为83%。EPDS-T的受试者工作特征分析曲线下面积为0.92,BDI为0.84。EPDS-T在检测不同孕期的重度抑郁症时有不同的最佳临界值:孕中期为13/14,孕晚期为12/13。未发现BDI-II在不同孕期有不同的最佳临界值。
对于检测台湾孕妇孕期的重度抑郁症,EPDS-T具有令人满意的敏感性和特异性,且有效性优于BDI-II。我们建议开展更多大样本研究,以确认在检测不同孕期的抑郁时是否存在不同的临界值。