Charmoy Alexia, Würzner Grégoire, Ruffieux Christiane, Hasler Christopher, Cachat François, Waeber Bernard, Burnier Michel
Division of Nephrology and Hypertension Consultation, University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Blood Press Monit. 2007 Oct;12(5):275-80. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3282c9ac9a.
Cuff inflation at the arm is known to cause an instantaneous rise in blood pressure, which might be due to the discomfort of the procedure and might interfere with the precision of the blood pressure measurement. In this study, we compared the reactive rise in blood pressure induced by cuff inflation when the cuff was placed at the upper arm level and at the wrist.
The reactive rise in systolic and diastolic blood pressure to cuff inflation was measured in 34 normotensive participants and 34 hypertensive patients. Each participant was equipped with two cuffs, one around the right upper arm (OMRON HEM-CR19, 22-32 cm) and one around the right wrist (OMRON HEM-CS 19, 17-22 cm; Omron Health Care Europe BV, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands). The cuffs were inflated in a double random order (maximal cuff pressure and position of the cuff) with two maximal cuff pressures: 180 and 240 mmHg. The cuffs were linked to an oscillometric device (OMRON HEM 907; Omron Health Care). Simultaneously, blood pressure was measured continuously at the middle finger of the left hand using photoplethysmography. Three measurements were made at each level of blood pressure at the arm and at the wrist, and the sequence of measurements was randomized.
In normotensive participants, no significant difference was observed in the reactive rise in blood pressure when the cuff was inflated either at the arm or at the wrist irrespective of the level of cuff inflation. Inflating a cuff at the arm, however, induced a significantly greater rise in blood pressure than inflating it at the wrist in hypertensive participants for both systolic and diastolic pressures (P<0.01), and at both levels of cuff inflation. The blood pressure response to cuff inflation was independent of baseline blood pressure.
The results show that in hypertensive patients, cuff inflation at the wrist produces a smaller reactive rise in blood pressure. The difference between the arm and the wrist is independent of the patient's level of blood pressure.
已知在手臂处进行袖带充气会导致血压瞬间升高,这可能是由于该操作带来的不适,且可能会干扰血压测量的准确性。在本研究中,我们比较了将袖带置于上臂水平和手腕处时,袖带充气引起的血压反应性升高情况。
对34名血压正常的参与者和34名高血压患者测量了袖带充气时收缩压和舒张压的反应性升高情况。每位参与者配备两个袖带,一个环绕右上臂(欧姆龙HEM-CR19,22 - 32厘米),另一个环绕右手腕(欧姆龙HEM-CS 19,17 - 22厘米;荷兰霍夫多普的欧姆龙欧洲医疗保健公司)。袖带以双随机顺序(最大袖带压力和袖带位置)充气,有两个最大袖带压力:180和240毫米汞柱。袖带连接到一个示波装置(欧姆龙HEM 907;欧姆龙医疗保健)。同时,使用光电容积描记法在左手食指连续测量血压。在手臂和手腕的每个血压水平进行三次测量,测量顺序是随机的。
在血压正常的参与者中,无论袖带充气水平如何,当袖带在上臂或手腕处充气时,血压的反应性升高没有显著差异。然而,对于高血压参与者,无论是收缩压还是舒张压,在上臂充气袖带引起的血压升高都明显大于在手腕处充气时(P<0.01),且在两个袖带充气水平均如此。血压对袖带充气的反应与基线血压无关。
结果表明在高血压患者中,手腕处袖带充气引起的血压反应性升高较小。手臂和手腕之间的差异与患者的血压水平无关。