• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分散注意力对学习准确性整体判断的影响。

The effect of divided attention on global judgment of learning accuracy.

作者信息

Barnes Kelly Anne, Dougherty Michael R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA.

出版信息

Am J Psychol. 2007 Fall;120(3):347-59.

PMID:17892083
Abstract

This study examined the effect of divided attention (DA) on global judgment of learning (JOL) accuracy in a multitrial list learning paradigm. A word monitoring task was used to divide attention. Participants were assigned to an attention condition (DA at encoding, DA at judgment, DA at retrieval, or focused attention) and completed 4 learning trials, each comprising a study, judgment, and recall phase. Participants showed greater overconfidence in the DA at encoding (Trial 2) and DA at retrieval (Trials 1 and 2) conditions than in the focused attention condition. DA atjudgment did not affect JOL accuracy, and there was no effect of DA in Trials 3 and 4 on JOL accuracy across all attention conditions. Results indicate that participants consider conditions of encoding and retrieval but do not engage in recall when forming global JOLs. These findings suggest that people rely on extrinsic cues when making repeated, global metamemoryjudgments.

摘要

本研究在多轮列表学习范式中考察了分散注意力(DA)对学习全局判断(JOL)准确性的影响。使用单词监测任务来分散注意力。参与者被分配到一种注意力条件(编码时分散注意力、判断时分散注意力、检索时分散注意力或集中注意力),并完成4轮学习试验,每轮试验包括学习、判断和回忆阶段。与集中注意力条件相比,参与者在编码时分散注意力(试验2)和检索时分散注意力(试验1和2)条件下表现出更大的过度自信。判断时分散注意力不影响JOL准确性,并且在所有注意力条件下,试验3和4中的分散注意力对JOL准确性均无影响。结果表明,参与者在形成全局JOL时会考虑编码和检索条件,但不会进行回忆。这些发现表明,人们在进行重复的全局元记忆判断时依赖外部线索。

相似文献

1
The effect of divided attention on global judgment of learning accuracy.分散注意力对学习准确性整体判断的影响。
Am J Psychol. 2007 Fall;120(3):347-59.
2
Processing similarity does not improve metamemory: evidence against transfer-appropriate monitoring.加工相似性并不能改善元记忆:反对迁移适配性监测的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Nov;29(6):1058-65. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1058.
3
Divided attention at encoding: effect on feeling-of-knowing.编码时的分散注意力:对知晓感的影响。
Conscious Cogn. 2009 Sep;18(3):754-61. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.04.001. Epub 2009 May 6.
4
How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology.学习与记忆判断背后有多少维度?来自状态追踪方法的证据。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005 Aug;134(3):308-26. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.308.
5
The influence of delaying judgments of learning on metacognitive accuracy: a meta-analytic review.延缓学习判断对元认知准确性的影响:元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2011 Jan;137(1):131-48. doi: 10.1037/a0021705.
6
A model for stochastic drift in memory strength to account for judgments of learning.一种用于解释学习判断的记忆强度随机漂移模型。
Psychol Rev. 2005 Oct;112(4):932-50. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.932.
7
Does ADHD in adults affect the relative accuracy of metamemory judgments?成人注意力缺陷多动障碍是否会影响元记忆判断的相对准确性?
J Atten Disord. 2006 Nov;10(2):160-70. doi: 10.1177/1087054706288116.
8
Interfering with remembering and knowing: effects of divided attention at retrieval.干扰记忆与知晓:提取时注意力分散的影响
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Feb;127(2):211-21. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.05.001. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
9
The role of age of acquisition in memory: effects on judgements of learning and recall.习得年龄在记忆中的作用:对学习判断和回忆的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Sep;64(9):1665-71. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.591495. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
10
Judgments of learning do not reduce to memory encoding operations: event-related potential evidence for distinct metacognitive processes.学习判断并不等同于记忆编码操作:事件相关电位证据表明存在不同的元认知过程。
Brain Res. 2010 Mar 8;1318:87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.11.047. Epub 2009 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Attention switching through text dissimilarity: a cognition research on fragmented reading behavior.通过文本差异进行注意力切换:碎片化阅读行为的认知研究
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Jun 25;18:1402746. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1402746. eCollection 2024.
2
Responsible attention: the effect of divided attention on metacognition and responsible remembering.负责的注意:分散注意对元认知和负责的记忆的影响。
Psychol Res. 2023 Jun;87(4):1085-1100. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01711-w. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
3
Dividing attention impairs metacognitive control more than monitoring.
注意分配比监测更能损害元认知控制。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Dec;28(6):2064-2074. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01950-9. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
4
Cognitive load eliminates the effect of perceptual information on judgments of learning with sentences.认知负荷消除了感知信息对句子学习判断的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Jan;47(1):106-116. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0853-1.
5
Selectively Distracted: Divided Attention and Memory for Important Information.选择性分心:注意力分散与重要信息记忆
Psychol Sci. 2017 Aug;28(8):1103-1115. doi: 10.1177/0956797617702502. Epub 2017 Jun 12.