• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过文本差异进行注意力切换:碎片化阅读行为的认知研究

Attention switching through text dissimilarity: a cognition research on fragmented reading behavior.

作者信息

Cao Jingjing, Luo Jingtao, Zhou Jia, Jiang Yunshan

机构信息

School of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.

College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Jun 25;18:1402746. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1402746. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2024.1402746
PMID:38983754
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11231079/
Abstract

People tend to obtain information through fragmented reading. However, this behavior itself might lead to distraction and affect cognitive ability. To address it, it is necessary to understand how fragmented reading behavior influences readers' attention switching. In this study, the researchers first collected online news that had 6 theme words and 60 sentences to compose the experimental material, then defined the degree of text dissimilarity, used to measure the degree of attention switching based on the differences in text content, and conducted an EEG experiment based on P200. The results showed that even after reading the fragmented text content with the same overall content, people in subsequent cognitive tasks had more working memory capacity, lower working memory load, and less negative impact on cognitive ability with the text content with lower text dissimilarity. Additionally, attention switching caused by differences in concept or working memory representation of text content might be the key factor affecting cognitive ability in fragmented reading behavior. The findings disclosed the relation between cognitive ability and fragmented reading and attention switching, opening a new perspective on the method of text dissimilarity. This study provides some references on how to reduce the negative impact of fragmented reading on cognitive ability on new media platforms.

摘要

人们倾向于通过碎片化阅读获取信息。然而,这种行为本身可能会导致注意力分散并影响认知能力。为了解决这一问题,有必要了解碎片化阅读行为是如何影响读者的注意力转换的。在本研究中,研究人员首先收集了包含6个主题词和60个句子的网络新闻来构成实验材料,然后定义了文本差异程度,用于基于文本内容的差异来衡量注意力转换程度,并基于P200进行了脑电图实验。结果表明,即使阅读了总体内容相同的碎片化文本内容后,在后续认知任务中,对于文本差异程度较低的文本内容,人们具有更多的工作记忆容量、更低的工作记忆负荷,且对认知能力的负面影响更小。此外,由文本内容的概念或工作记忆表征差异引起的注意力转换可能是影响碎片化阅读行为中认知能力的关键因素。这些发现揭示了认知能力与碎片化阅读及注意力转换之间的关系,为文本差异度方法开辟了新视角。本研究为如何在新媒体平台上减少碎片化阅读对认知能力的负面影响提供了一些参考。

相似文献

1
Attention switching through text dissimilarity: a cognition research on fragmented reading behavior.通过文本差异进行注意力切换:碎片化阅读行为的认知研究
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Jun 25;18:1402746. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1402746. eCollection 2024.
2
In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.在同时进行的记忆和听觉感知任务中,瞳孔扩张反应对记忆负荷的敏感性高于对听觉刺激特征的敏感性。
Ear Hear. 2019 Mar/Apr;40(2):272-286. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000612.
3
The effects of university students' fragmented reading on cognitive development in the new media age: evidence from Chinese higher education.新媒体时代大学生碎片化阅读对认知发展的影响:来自中国高等教育的证据。
PeerJ. 2022 Aug 23;10:e13861. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13861. eCollection 2022.
4
A measure of individual differences in readers' approaches to text and its relation to reading experience and reading comprehension.一种衡量读者处理文本方式的个体差异及其与阅读体验和阅读理解关系的方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Feb;55(2):899-931. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01852-1. Epub 2022 May 3.
5
[Text comprehension, cognitive resources and aging].[文本理解、认知资源与衰老]
Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2007 Mar;5(1):47-64.
6
The impact of auditory distraction on reading comprehension: An individual differences investigation.听觉干扰对阅读理解的影响:一项个体差异研究。
Mem Cognit. 2022 May;50(4):852-863. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01242-6. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
7
An examination of the seductive details effect in terms of working memory capacity.从工作记忆容量角度对诱人细节效应的考察。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Mar;34(2):344-55. doi: 10.3758/bf03193412.
8
Task-irrelevant decorative pictures increase cognitive load during text processing but have no effects on learning or working memory performance: an EEG and eye-tracking study.任务无关的装饰性图片会增加文本处理过程中的认知负荷,但对学习或工作记忆性能没有影响:一项 EEG 和眼动追踪研究。
Psychol Res. 2024 Jun;88(4):1362-1388. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-01939-8. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
9
Learning disabled and average readers' working memory and comprehension: does metacognition play a role?学习障碍者与普通阅读者的工作记忆及阅读理解:元认知起作用吗?
Br J Educ Psychol. 1996 Sep;66 ( Pt 3):333-55. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1996.tb01201.x.
10
Using texts in science education: cognitive processes and knowledge representation.在科学教育中使用文本:认知过程与知识表示。
Science. 2010 Apr 23;328(5977):453-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1182594.

引用本文的文献

1
Mobile Reading Attention of College Students in Different Reading Environments: An Eye-Tracking Study.不同阅读环境下大学生的移动阅读注意力:一项眼动追踪研究。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 14;15(7):953. doi: 10.3390/bs15070953.
2
The Effectiveness of the Pitstop Method of Teaching Among Phase II Medical Students.第二阶段医学生中“停车”教学法的有效性
Cureus. 2024 Oct 20;16(10):e71906. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71906. eCollection 2024 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Memory failure predicted by attention lapsing and media multitasking.注意力不集中和媒体多任务处理预示着记忆衰退。
Nature. 2020 Nov;587(7832):87-91. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2870-z. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
2
Models of sustained attention.持续注意力模型。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Oct;29:174-180. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
3
The role of task difficulty in theoretical accounts of mind wandering.任务难度在思维漫游理论解释中的作用。
Conscious Cogn. 2018 Oct;65:255-262. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
4
Mind-Wandering as a Natural Kind: A Family-Resemblances View.心流体验作为一种自然类别:家族相似性观点。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Jun;22(6):479-490. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.03.010.
5
Tracking behavioral and neural fluctuations during sustained attention: A robust replication and extension.追踪持续注意力期间的行为和神经波动:一项稳健的复制和扩展。
Neuroimage. 2018 May 1;171:148-164. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
6
Media Multitasking and Cognitive, Psychological, Neural, and Learning Differences.媒体多任务处理与认知、心理、神经及学习差异。
Pediatrics. 2017 Nov;140(Suppl 2):S62-S66. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-1758D.
7
Dynamic Trial-by-Trial Recoding of Task-Set Representations in the Frontoparietal Cortex Mediates Behavioral Flexibility.额顶叶皮层中任务集表征的逐次动态编码介导行为灵活性。
J Neurosci. 2017 Nov 8;37(45):11037-11050. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0935-17.2017. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
8
A locus coeruleus-norepinephrine account of individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control.蓝斑-去甲肾上腺素对工作记忆容量和注意力控制个体差异的解释。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1282-1311. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1220-5.
9
Mind-wandering as spontaneous thought: a dynamic framework.思维漫游即自发性思维:一个动态框架。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016 Nov;17(11):718-731. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.113. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
10
Feature-selective Attention in Frontoparietal Cortex: Multivoxel Codes Adjust to Prioritize Task-relevant Information.额顶叶皮质中的特征选择性注意:多体素编码进行调整以优先处理与任务相关的信息。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Feb;29(2):310-321. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01039. Epub 2016 Sep 14.