• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择性分心:注意力分散与重要信息记忆

Selectively Distracted: Divided Attention and Memory for Important Information.

作者信息

Middlebrooks Catherine D, Kerr Tyson, Castel Alan D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2017 Aug;28(8):1103-1115. doi: 10.1177/0956797617702502. Epub 2017 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1177/0956797617702502
PMID:28604267
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5546942/
Abstract

Distractions and multitasking are generally detrimental to learning and memory. Nevertheless, people often study while listening to music, sitting in noisy coffee shops, or intermittently checking their e-mail. The current experiments examined how distractions and divided attention influence one's ability to selectively remember valuable information. Participants studied lists of words that ranged in value from 1 to 10 points while completing a digit-detection task, while listening to music, or without distractions. Though participants recalled fewer words following digit detection than in the other conditions, there were no significant differences between conditions in terms of selectively remembering the most valuable words. Similar results were obtained across a variety of divided-attention tasks that stressed attention and working memory to different degrees, which suggests that people may compensate for divided-attention costs by selectively attending to the most valuable items and that factors that worsen memory do not necessarily impair the ability to selectively remember important information.

摘要

分心和一心多用通常对学习和记忆有害。然而,人们经常在听音乐、坐在嘈杂的咖啡店或者时不时查看电子邮件时学习。当前的实验研究了分心和注意力分散如何影响一个人选择性记忆有价值信息的能力。参与者在完成数字检测任务、听音乐或者没有分心的情况下学习价值从1到10分不等的单词列表。尽管与其他条件相比,参与者在数字检测后回忆起的单词较少,但在选择性记忆最有价值的单词方面,各条件之间没有显著差异。在各种不同程度强调注意力和工作记忆的注意力分散任务中都得到了类似的结果,这表明人们可能通过选择性地关注最有价值的项目来弥补注意力分散的代价,而且那些使记忆变差的因素不一定会损害选择性记忆重要信息的能力。

相似文献

1
Selectively Distracted: Divided Attention and Memory for Important Information.选择性分心:注意力分散与重要信息记忆
Psychol Sci. 2017 Aug;28(8):1103-1115. doi: 10.1177/0956797617702502. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
2
The development of memory efficiency and value-directed remembering across the life span: a cross-sectional study of memory and selectivity.记忆效率和价值导向记忆在整个生命周期中的发展:记忆和选择性的横断面研究。
Dev Psychol. 2011 Nov;47(6):1553-64. doi: 10.1037/a0025623. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
3
Memory capacity, selective control, and value-directed remembering in children with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).儿童注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)与非注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的记忆容量、选择性控制和价值导向记忆。
Neuropsychology. 2011 Jan;25(1):15-24. doi: 10.1037/a0020298.
4
Interference between a fast-paced spatial puzzle task and verbal memory demands.快节奏空间拼图任务与言语记忆需求之间的干扰。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Jun;235(6):1899-1907. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4938-z. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
5
The role of attention in remembering important item-location associations.注意力在记忆重要物品-位置关联中的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Nov;46(8):1248-1262. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0834-4.
6
Fine motor movements while drawing during the encoding phase of a serial verbal recall task reduce working memory performance.在串行言语回忆任务的编码阶段进行绘图时的精细运动动作会降低工作记忆表现。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Feb;164:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Jan 16.
7
The value in rushing: Memory and selectivity when short on time.匆忙中的价值:时间紧迫时的记忆与选择性
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Oct;170:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 12.
8
The influence of levels of processing on recall from working memory and delayed recall tasks.水平加工对工作记忆和延迟回忆任务中回忆的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Sep;37(5):1258-63. doi: 10.1037/a0023923.
9
The effects of divided attention and of stimulus repetition on item-item binding in verbal working memory.注意分配和刺激重复对言语工作记忆中项目-项目绑定的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Nov;45(11):1955-1969. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000698. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
10
The extent of working memory deficits associated with Williams syndrome: exploration of verbal and spatial domains and executively controlled processes.与威廉姆斯综合征相关的工作记忆缺陷程度:言语和空间领域以及执行控制过程的探索。
Brain Cogn. 2011 Nov;77(2):208-14. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.08.009. Epub 2011 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Value-Directed Remembering: A Dual-Process Perspective.价值导向记忆:一种双过程视角
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 17;15(8):1113. doi: 10.3390/bs15081113.
2
Talker-specificity beyond the lexicon: Recognition memory for spoken sentences.词汇之外的说话者特异性:对口语句子的识别记忆。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Aug 27. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02751-0.
3
Prediction of information value influences memory: the effect of predicted and assigned value on memory.信息价值的预测会影响记忆:预测价值和赋予价值对记忆的影响。
Memory. 2025 May;33(5):588-603. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2025.2502488. Epub 2025 May 14.
4
Responsible remembering: The role of metacognition, forgetting, attention, and retrieval in adaptive memory.适应性记忆中的负责记忆:元认知、遗忘、注意力及提取的作用
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb;32(1):156-175. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02554-9. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
5
The effect of value on context and target recollection in memory for truth and falsity.价值对真假记忆中语境和目标回忆的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Aug;52(6):1451-1462. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01554-3. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
6
Impact of process interference on memory encoding and retrieval processes in dual-task situations.双任务情境下过程干扰对记忆编码和提取过程的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Aug;52(6):1246-1262. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01539-2. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
7
Working memory prioritisation effects in tactile immediate serial recall.触觉即时顺序回忆中的工作记忆优先化效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Nov;77(11):2354-2363. doi: 10.1177/17470218241231283. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
8
Goal-directed remembering in older adults.老年人的目标导向记忆。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2024 Sep;31(5):891-913. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2023.2282223. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
9
Read carefully, because this is important! How value-driven strategies impact sentence memory.仔细阅读,因为这很重要!价值驱动策略如何影响句子记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Oct;51(7):1511-1526. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01409-3. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
10
Age-Related Differences in Framing Selective Memory in Terms of Gains and Losses.年龄相关的在收益和损失方面框架选择性记忆的差异。
Exp Aging Res. 2024 Jul-Sep;50(4):506-521. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2023.2233366. Epub 2023 Jul 6.

本文引用的文献

1
The value in rushing: Memory and selectivity when short on time.匆忙中的价值:时间紧迫时的记忆与选择性
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Oct;170:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 12.
2
Memory for Allergies and Health Foods: How Younger and Older Adults Strategically Remember Critical Health Information.对过敏和健康食品的记忆:年轻人和老年人如何策略性地记住关键健康信息。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2016 May;71(3):389-99. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbv032. Epub 2015 May 14.
3
The development of a short domain-general measure of working memory capacity.一种简短的通用工作记忆容量测量方法的开发。
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Dec;47(4):1343-1355. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0543-2.
4
Type I error inflation in the traditional by-participant analysis to metamemory accuracy: a generalized mixed-effects model perspective.传统的按参与者分析中关于元记忆准确性的I型错误膨胀:广义混合效应模型视角。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Sep;40(5):1287-306. doi: 10.1037/a0036914. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
5
The effects of distraction on metacognition and metacognition on distraction: evidence from recognition memory.分心对元认知的影响,以及元认知对分心的影响:来自再认记忆的证据。
Front Psychol. 2014 May 14;5:439. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00439. eCollection 2014.
6
Value-based modulation of memory encoding involves strategic engagement of fronto-temporal semantic processing regions.基于价值的记忆编码调节涉及额颞语义加工区域的策略性参与。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Jun;14(2):578-92. doi: 10.3758/s13415-014-0275-x.
7
Metacognition of multitasking: How well do we predict the costs of divided attention?多任务处理的元认知:我们对注意力分散的代价预测得有多准确?
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2014 Jun;20(2):158-165. doi: 10.1037/xap0000010. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
8
Evidence for habituation of the irrelevant-sound effect on serial recall.系列回忆中无关声音效应的习惯化证据。
Mem Cognit. 2014 May;42(4):609-21. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0381-y.
9
Research practices that can prevent an inflation of false-positive rates.防止虚报率膨胀的研究实践。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2014 May;18(2):107-18. doi: 10.1177/1088868313496330. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
10
Selecting valuable information to remember: age-related differences and similarities in self-regulated learning.选择有价值的信息进行记忆:自我调节学习中的年龄相关差异和相似性。
Psychol Aging. 2013 Mar;28(1):232-42. doi: 10.1037/a0030678. Epub 2012 Dec 31.