• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

负责的注意:分散注意对元认知和负责的记忆的影响。

Responsible attention: the effect of divided attention on metacognition and responsible remembering.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2023 Jun;87(4):1085-1100. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01711-w. Epub 2022 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-022-01711-w
PMID:35838835
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10191991/
Abstract

We are frequently exposed to situations where we need to remember important information when our attentional resources are divided; however, it was previously unclear how divided attention impacts responsible remembering: selective memory for important information to avoid consequences for forgetting. In the present study, we examined participants' memory for valuable information, metacognitive accuracy, and goal-directed cognitive control mechanisms when under full and divided attention. In Experiment 1, participants were presented with words paired with point values counting towards their score if recalled but were required to "bet" on whether they would remember it. Results revealed that selective memory for high-value information was impaired under divided attention. In Experiment 2, we presented participants with unassociated word pairs and solicited metacognitive predictions of recall (i.e., JOLs). Results revealed that the relative accuracy of participants' metacognitive judgments was enhanced when studying under divided attention. Experiment 3 examined cognitive control mechanisms to selectively remember goal-relevant information at the expense of information that could potentially be offloaded (i.e., responsible forgetting). Results revealed that participants' ability to strategically prioritize goal-relevant information at the expense of information that could be offloaded was preserved under divided attention. Collectively, responsible attention encompasses how attentional resources impact one's ability to engage in responsible remembering and we demonstrate that responsible remembering can be impaired, enhanced, and preserved in certain contexts.

摘要

我们经常会遇到需要在注意力分散的情况下记住重要信息的情况;然而,之前并不清楚注意力分散会如何影响负责任的记忆:选择性地记住重要信息,以避免因遗忘而产生后果。在本研究中,我们考察了参与者在全神贯注和注意力分散两种情况下对有价值信息的记忆、元认知准确性和目标导向的认知控制机制。在实验 1 中,参与者会看到与分值配对的单词,如果回忆起来就可以得分,但他们需要“下注”是否能记住。结果表明,在注意力分散的情况下,对高价值信息的选择性记忆受到了损害。在实验 2 中,我们向参与者呈现不相关的单词对,并要求他们对回忆进行元认知预测(即 JOL)。结果表明,在注意力分散的情况下,参与者元认知判断的相对准确性得到了提高。实验 3 考察了认知控制机制,以有选择地记住与目标相关的信息,而忽略可能被卸载的信息(即负责任的遗忘)。结果表明,参与者以牺牲可能被卸载的信息为代价,有策略地优先考虑目标相关信息的能力在注意力分散的情况下得到了保留。总的来说,负责任的注意力包括注意力资源如何影响人们参与负责任的记忆的能力,我们证明了在某些情况下,负责任的记忆可能会受到损害、增强和保留。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f40e/10191991/31a91cf961fe/426_2022_1711_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f40e/10191991/5d3dd6a486c8/426_2022_1711_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f40e/10191991/1688ff88107a/426_2022_1711_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f40e/10191991/06f8531bfcb0/426_2022_1711_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f40e/10191991/31a91cf961fe/426_2022_1711_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f40e/10191991/5d3dd6a486c8/426_2022_1711_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f40e/10191991/1688ff88107a/426_2022_1711_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f40e/10191991/06f8531bfcb0/426_2022_1711_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f40e/10191991/31a91cf961fe/426_2022_1711_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Responsible attention: the effect of divided attention on metacognition and responsible remembering.负责的注意:分散注意对元认知和负责的记忆的影响。
Psychol Res. 2023 Jun;87(4):1085-1100. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01711-w. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
2
Strategic metacognition: Self-paced study time and responsible remembering.策略性元认知:自我调节的学习时间和负责任的记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Jan;51(1):234-251. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01307-0. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
3
Metamemory that matters: judgments of importance can engage responsible remembering.重要的元记忆:重要性判断可以激发负责任的记忆。
Memory. 2021 Mar;29(3):271-283. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1887895. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
4
Responsible remembering and forgetting as contributors to memory for important information.负责的记忆和遗忘是对重要信息记忆的贡献。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Jul;49(5):895-911. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01139-4. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
5
Framing effects in value-directed remembering.价值导向记忆中的框架效应。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Aug;50(6):1350-1361. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01317-y. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
6
Responsible remembering: The role of metacognition, forgetting, attention, and retrieval in adaptive memory.适应性记忆中的负责记忆:元认知、遗忘、注意力及提取的作用
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb;32(1):156-175. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02554-9. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
7
The effect of perceptual processing fluency and value on metacognition and remembering.知觉加工流畅性和价值对元认知和记忆的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Jun;29(3):910-921. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-02030-8. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
8
Explaining the forgetting bias effect on value judgments: The influence of memory for a past test.解释遗忘偏差对价值判断的影响:过去测试记忆的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Apr;45(3):362-374. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0674-z.
9
The effect of emotional valence and font size on metacognition and memory.情绪效价和字体大小对元认知和记忆的影响。
Memory. 2024 Feb;32(2):252-263. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2024.2307919. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
10
Dividing attention impairs metacognitive control more than monitoring.注意分配比监测更能损害元认知控制。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Dec;28(6):2064-2074. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01950-9. Epub 2021 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Memory accessibility as a cue for perceived importance.作为感知重要性线索的记忆可及性。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01772-3.
2
Responsible remembering: The role of metacognition, forgetting, attention, and retrieval in adaptive memory.适应性记忆中的负责记忆:元认知、遗忘、注意力及提取的作用
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb;32(1):156-175. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02554-9. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
3
Impact of process interference on memory encoding and retrieval processes in dual-task situations.双任务情境下过程干扰对记忆编码和提取过程的影响。

本文引用的文献

1
Serial and strategic memory processes in goal-directed selective remembering.目标导向选择性记忆中的连续和策略性记忆过程。
Cognition. 2022 Aug;225:105178. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105178. Epub 2022 May 26.
2
Framing effects in value-directed remembering.价值导向记忆中的框架效应。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Aug;50(6):1350-1361. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01317-y. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
3
Strategic metacognition: Self-paced study time and responsible remembering.策略性元认知:自我调节的学习时间和负责任的记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Aug;52(6):1246-1262. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01539-2. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
4
Media Multitasking in Mixed Reality Learning Situations: What Determines Its Effectiveness?混合现实学习情境中的媒体多任务处理:是什么决定了它的有效性?
Psychol Russ. 2023 Dec 1;16(4):90-108. doi: 10.11621/pir.2023.0406. eCollection 2023.
5
Age-related differences in selective associative memory: implications for responsible remembering.与年龄相关的选择性联想记忆差异:对负责任记忆的启示。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2024 Jul;31(4):682-704. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2023.2249189. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
6
Age-Related Differences in Framing Selective Memory in Terms of Gains and Losses.年龄相关的在收益和损失方面框架选择性记忆的差异。
Exp Aging Res. 2024 Jul-Sep;50(4):506-521. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2023.2233366. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
7
Age-related differences in memory when offloading important information.记忆在信息卸载时与年龄相关的差异。
Psychol Aging. 2023 Aug;38(5):415-427. doi: 10.1037/pag0000750. Epub 2023 May 11.
8
Younger and older adults' strategic use of associative memory and metacognitive control when learning foreign vocabulary words of varying importance.不同重要性的外语词汇学习中,年轻和年长成人的联想记忆和元认知控制的策略使用。
Psychol Aging. 2023 Mar;38(2):103-116. doi: 10.1037/pag0000730. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
9
Age-Related Differences in Overcoming Interference When Selectively Remembering Important Information.年龄相关的在选择性地记住重要信息时克服干扰的差异。
Exp Aging Res. 2024 Mar-Apr;50(2):190-205. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2023.2176629. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
Mem Cognit. 2023 Jan;51(1):234-251. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01307-0. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
4
Responsible Remembering and Forgetting in Younger and Older Adults.年轻人和老年人的负责任的记忆和遗忘。
Exp Aging Res. 2022 Oct-Dec;48(5):455-473. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2022.2033592. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
5
The effect of perceptual processing fluency and value on metacognition and remembering.知觉加工流畅性和价值对元认知和记忆的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Jun;29(3):910-921. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-02030-8. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
6
Memory and Reward-Based Learning: A Value-Directed Remembering Perspective.记忆和奖励学习:一种价值导向的记忆视角。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2022 Jan 4;73:25-52. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-032921-050951. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
7
The role of attention and ageing in the retrieval dynamics of value-directed remembering.注意和年龄在价值导向记忆提取动态中的作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 May;75(5):954-968. doi: 10.1177/17470218211046612. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
8
Multitasking costs on metacognition in a triple-task paradigm.三重任务范式中元认知的多重任务代价。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Dec;28(6):2075-2084. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01967-0. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
9
The effects of divided attention at encoding on specific and gist-based associative episodic memory.注意分配对基于特定信息和主旨信息的情节性联想记忆的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Jan;50(1):59-76. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01196-9. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
10
Dividing attention impairs metacognitive control more than monitoring.注意分配比监测更能损害元认知控制。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Dec;28(6):2064-2074. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01950-9. Epub 2021 Jun 15.