Näpflin Markus, Wildi Marc, Sarnthein Johannes
Neurochirurgie, Universitätsspital Zürich, CH-8091 Zürich, Switzerland.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Nov;118(11):2519-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.07.022. Epub 2007 Sep 24.
When EEG is recorded in humans, the question arises whether the resting EEG remains stable. We compared the inter-individual variation in spectral observables to the intra-individual stability over more than a year.
We recorded resting EEG in 55 healthy adults with eyes closed. In 20 persons EEG was recorded in a second session with retest intervals 12-40 months. For electrodes AFz, Cz and Pz alpha peak frequency and alpha peak height were transformed into Z-scores. We compared the curve shape of power spectra by first aligning alpha peaks to 10Hz and then regressing spectra pairwise onto each other to calculate a t-value. The t-value and differences of Z-scores for all pairs of sessions were entered into a generalized linear model (GLM) where binary output represents the recognition probability. The results were cross-validated by out-of-sample testing.
Of the 40 sessions, 35 were correctly matched. The shape of power spectra contributed most to recognition. Out of all 2960 pairwise comparisons 99.5% were correct, with sensitivity 88% and specificity 99.5%.
Our statistical apparatus allows to identify those spectral EEG observables which qualify as statistical signature of a person.
The effect of external factors on EEG observables can be contrasted against their normal variability over time.
在对人类进行脑电图(EEG)记录时,会出现静息EEG是否保持稳定的问题。我们比较了个体间频谱观测值的差异与个体内超过一年时间的稳定性。
我们记录了55名闭眼健康成年人的静息EEG。其中20人在第二次记录时,复测间隔为12 - 40个月。对于电极AFz、Cz和Pz,将α峰频率和α峰高度转换为Z分数。我们通过首先将α峰对齐到10Hz,然后将频谱两两相互回归以计算t值,来比较功率谱的曲线形状。所有记录对的t值和Z分数差异被输入到一个广义线性模型(GLM)中,其中二元输出表示识别概率。结果通过样本外测试进行交叉验证。
在40次记录中,35次匹配正确。功率谱的形状对识别贡献最大。在所有2960次两两比较中,99.5%正确,灵敏度为88%,特异性为99.5%。
我们的统计方法能够识别那些可作为个体统计特征的EEG频谱观测值。
外部因素对EEG观测值的影响可以与其随时间的正常变异性进行对比。