Ball James D, Hills Eleanor, Altaf Afzaa, Ramesh Pranav, Green Matthew, Surti Farhaana Bs, Minhas Jatinder S, Robinson Thompson G, Bond Bert, Lester Alice, Hoiland Ryan, Klein Timo, Liu Jia, Nasr Nathalie, Junejo Rehan T, Müller Martin, Lecchini-Visintini Andrea, Mitsis Georgios, Burma Joel S, Smirl Jonathan D, Pizzi Michael A, Manquat Elsa, Lucas Samuel Je, Mullinger Karen J, Mayhew Steve, Bailey Damian M, Rodrigues Gabriel, Soares Pedro Paulo, Phillips Aaron A, Prokopiou Prokopis C, C Beishon Lucy
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2024 Dec;44(12):1409-1429. doi: 10.1177/0271678X241270452. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
Neurovascular coupling (NVC) is the perturbation of cerebral blood flow (CBF) to meet varying metabolic demands induced by various levels of neural activity. NVC may be assessed by Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD), using task activation protocols, but with significant methodological heterogeneity between studies, hindering cross-study comparisons. Therefore, this review aimed to summarise and compare available methods for TCD-based healthy NVC assessments. Medline (Ovid), Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE (Ovid) and CINAHL were searched using a predefined search strategy (PROSPERO: CRD42019153228), generating 6006 articles. Included studies contained TCD-based assessments of NVC in healthy adults. Study quality was assessed using a checklist, and findings were synthesised narratively. 76 studies (2697 participants) met the review criteria. There was significant heterogeneity in the participant position used (e.g., seated vs supine), in TCD equipment, and vessel insonated (e.g. middle, posterior, and anterior cerebral arteries). Larger, more significant, TCD-based NVC responses typically included a seated position, baseline durations >one-minute, extraneous light control, and implementation of previously validated protocols. In addition, complementary, combined position, vessel insonated and stimulation type protocols were associated with more significant NVC results. Recommendations are detailed here, but further investigation is required in patient populations, for further optimisation of TCD-based NVC assessments.
神经血管耦合(NVC)是指脑血流量(CBF)的改变,以满足由各种神经活动水平引起的不同代谢需求。可以使用任务激活方案,通过经颅多普勒超声(TCD)来评估NVC,但研究之间存在显著的方法学异质性,这阻碍了跨研究比较。因此,本综述旨在总结和比较基于TCD的健康NVC评估的现有方法。使用预定义的搜索策略(PROSPERO:CRD42019153228)对Medline(Ovid)、Scopus、Web of Science、EMBASE(Ovid)和CINAHL进行搜索,共检索到6006篇文章。纳入的研究包括对健康成年人基于TCD的NVC评估。使用检查表评估研究质量,并对研究结果进行叙述性综合。76项研究(2697名参与者)符合综述标准。在参与者姿势(如坐姿与仰卧位)、TCD设备以及所探测的血管(如大脑中动脉、大脑后动脉和大脑前动脉)方面存在显著异质性。基于TCD的更大、更显著的NVC反应通常包括坐姿、基线持续时间>1分钟、外部光线控制以及实施先前验证的方案。此外,补充性、联合姿势、所探测血管和刺激类型方案与更显著的NVC结果相关。此处详细给出了建议,但在患者群体中还需要进一步研究,以进一步优化基于TCD的NVC评估。