Albrecht B, Rothenberger A, Sergeant J, Tannock R, Uebel H, Banaschewski T
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2008;115(2):241-7. doi: 10.1007/s00702-007-0818-1. Epub 2007 Sep 25.
Deficits in interference control are ascribed to patients suffering from ADHD by a number of cognitive theories. However, previous research using the Stroop Colour Word Interference Task has demonstrated mixed results that may be explained by methodological issues (e.g., possible impact of colour perception abilities on interference liability, different approaches to calculate interference scores, conflation of speed and accuracy factors). Hence, this study included two computerized versions of the Stroop (Colour-Stroop, Counting Stroop) which allowed to calculate separate measures of speed and accuracy, provided a more rigorous approach to calculate interference, and permitted to investigate the effects of stimulus properties on interference. Participants were 14 children with a DSM-IV diagnosis of ADHD combined type and 15 matched controls. Children completed a traditional Stroop as well as both a computerized Colour- and Counting-Stroop. Results indicated that the ADHD group showed higher interference scores than controls in the Colour-Stroop, but not in the Counting-Stroop. Thus, interference control may be not generally impaired in ADHD, and examinations with the Colour Stroop should be interpreted with care.
一些认知理论将干扰控制缺陷归因于患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的患者。然而,先前使用斯特鲁普颜色词干扰任务的研究结果不一,这可能是由方法学问题所解释的(例如,颜色感知能力对干扰易感性的可能影响、计算干扰分数的不同方法、速度和准确性因素的混淆)。因此,本研究纳入了两个计算机化版本的斯特鲁普任务(颜色斯特鲁普、计数斯特鲁普),它们能够分别计算速度和准确性的指标,提供了一种更严格的计算干扰的方法,并允许研究刺激属性对干扰的影响。参与者包括14名被诊断为ADHD混合型的儿童和15名匹配的对照组儿童。儿童们完成了传统的斯特鲁普任务以及计算机化的颜色斯特鲁普和计数斯特鲁普任务。结果表明,ADHD组在颜色斯特鲁普任务中的干扰分数高于对照组,但在计数斯特鲁普任务中并非如此。因此,ADHD患者的干扰控制可能并非普遍受损,对颜色斯特鲁普任务的检查结果应谨慎解读。