Kyushu University, Fukouoka, Japan.
J Atten Disord. 2011 Aug;15(6):499-505. doi: 10.1177/1087054710367607. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
To examine whether participants with ADHD showed a deficit in Stroop/reverse-Stroop interference by comparing them to non-ADHD participants.
A group with ADHD, primarily inattentive type (n = 15), and a paired non-ADHD group (n = 15) completed the group version of the Stroop/reverse-Stroop test.
Asymmetric interference was observed between the Stroop test and the reverse-Stroop test in ADHD participants, presenting evidence contrary to Barkley's behavioral inhibition model of ADHD in which response inhibition deficits pertained only to the ADHD-C subtype.
Participants with ADHD showed a control deficit in reverse-Stroop interference but not in Stroop interference.
通过与非 ADHD 参与者进行比较，检查 ADHD 参与者是否存在 Stroop/逆向 Stroop 干扰缺陷。
一组 ADHD（主要为注意力不集中型）患者（n = 15）和一组配对的非 ADHD 患者（n = 15）完成了 Stroop/逆向 Stroop 测试的团体版本。
ADHD 参与者在 Stroop 测试和逆向 Stroop 测试之间观察到了不对称的干扰，这与 Barkley 的 ADHD 行为抑制模型相矛盾，该模型认为反应抑制缺陷仅与 ADHD-C 亚型有关。
ADHD 参与者在逆向 Stroop 干扰中表现出控制缺陷，但在 Stroop 干扰中没有表现出缺陷。
