• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拉姆齐量表的可靠性有限。

The limited reliability of the Ramsay scale.

作者信息

Olson Daiwai, Lynn Mary, Thoyre Suzanne M, Graffagnino Carmelo

机构信息

Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Neurocrit Care. 2007;7(3):227-31. doi: 10.1007/s12028-007-0069-x.

DOI:10.1007/s12028-007-0069-x
PMID:17896083
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Ramsay scale which is internationally one of the most frequently cited sedation assessment tools has not had adequate psychometric evaluation. The objective of this study was to test the inter-rater reliability of the Ramsay scale.

METHODS

This study was based on a prospective, single-blinded randomized design targeted to provide a psychometric analysis of the Ramsay scale. Following informed consent nurses were provided with written instructions on use of the Ramsay scale. A total of 241 critical care nurses were recruited from seven specialty critical care units in a major teaching institution; 237 nurses completed the study. After reviewing the written instructions, nurses viewed one out of six randomly selected videos of a sedation assessment and then scored that video using the Ramsay scale. Each nurse viewed and independently scored only one video using the Ramsay scale.

RESULTS

Across the 237 nurses, who scored one out of six videos using the Ramsay scale a Kappa of 0.28 was obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these findings, there is insufficient evidence to support the reliability of the Ramsay scale as a measure of sedation assessment.

摘要

引言

拉姆齐量表是国际上最常被引用的镇静评估工具之一,但尚未进行充分的心理测量学评估。本研究的目的是测试拉姆齐量表的评分者间信度。

方法

本研究基于前瞻性、单盲随机设计,旨在对拉姆齐量表进行心理测量学分析。在获得知情同意后,向护士提供了关于使用拉姆齐量表的书面说明。从一所主要教学机构的七个专科重症监护病房招募了241名重症监护护士;237名护士完成了研究。在阅读书面说明后,护士观看了六个随机选择的镇静评估视频中的一个,然后使用拉姆齐量表对该视频进行评分。每位护士仅使用拉姆齐量表观看并独立评分一个视频。

结果

在237名使用拉姆齐量表对六个视频中的一个进行评分的护士中,kappa值为0.28。

结论

基于这些发现,没有足够的证据支持拉姆齐量表作为镇静评估指标的可靠性。

相似文献

1
The limited reliability of the Ramsay scale.拉姆齐量表的可靠性有限。
Neurocrit Care. 2007;7(3):227-31. doi: 10.1007/s12028-007-0069-x.
2
Reliable assessment of sedation level in routine clinical practice by adding an instruction to the Ramsay Scale.通过在拉姆齐量表中添加一项说明,在常规临床实践中对镇静水平进行可靠评估。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009 Jun;8(2):125-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2008.10.004. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
3
Validity and reliability of an intuitive conscious sedation scoring tool: the nursing instrument for the communication of sedation.直观意识镇静评分工具的有效性和可靠性:镇静沟通的护理工具。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Aug;38(8):1674-84. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181e7c73e.
4
Depth of sedation in children undergoing computed tomography: validity and reliability of the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS).接受计算机断层扫描的儿童的镇静深度:密歇根大学镇静量表(UMSS)的有效性和可靠性。
Br J Anaesth. 2002 Feb;88(2):241-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/88.2.241.
5
Validation of the Ramsay scale for invasive procedures under deep sedation in pediatrics.验证 Ramsay 镇静评分用于儿科深度镇静下的有创操作。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2021 Oct;31(10):1097-1104. doi: 10.1111/pan.14248. Epub 2021 Jul 11.
6
Ramsay Sedation Scale and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale: A Cross-sectional Study.拉姆齐镇静评分量表与里士满躁动镇静评分量表:一项横断面研究。
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2019 Mar/Apr;38(2):90-95. doi: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000346.
7
[Are all sedation scales equally useful for nursing assessment?].[所有的镇静评分量表对护理评估都同样有用吗?]
Enferm Intensiva. 1999 Jan-Mar;10(1):3-12.
8
The COMFORT behavioural scale and the modified FLACC scale in paediatric intensive care.儿科重症监护中的COMFORT行为量表和改良的FLACC量表。
Nurs Crit Care. 2009 May-Jun;14(3):122-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2009.00323.x.
9
The reliability and validity of a new and simple method to measure sedation levels in intensive care patients: a pilot study.一种测量重症监护患者镇静水平的新型简单方法的可靠性和有效性:一项试点研究。
Heart Lung. 2006 Mar-Apr;35(2):137-43. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2005.09.005.
10
Prospective evaluation of the Sedation-Agitation Scale for adult critically ill patients.成人重症患者镇静-躁动量表的前瞻性评估。
Crit Care Med. 1999 Jul;27(7):1325-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199907000-00022.

引用本文的文献

1
Bispectral Index monitoring in cancer patients undergoing palliative sedation: a preliminary report.癌症患者接受姑息性镇静时的双频谱指数监测:初步报告。
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Oct;25(10):3143-3149. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3722-8. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
2
Changes in resting neural connectivity during propofol sedation.异丙酚镇静期间静息状态神经连通性的变化。
PLoS One. 2010 Dec 2;5(12):e14224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014224.
3
BIS and spectral entropy monitoring during sedation with midazolam/remifentanil and dexmedetomidine/remifentanil.

本文引用的文献

1
Bispectral Index compared to Ramsay score for sedation monitoring in intensive care units.在重症监护病房中,双谱指数与 Ramsay 评分用于镇静监测的比较。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2006 May;72(5):329-36.
2
The reliability and validity of a new and simple method to measure sedation levels in intensive care patients: a pilot study.一种测量重症监护患者镇静水平的新型简单方法的可靠性和有效性:一项试点研究。
Heart Lung. 2006 Mar-Apr;35(2):137-43. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2005.09.005.
3
Comparison of electrophysiologic monitors with clinical assessment of level of sedation.
咪达唑仑/瑞芬太尼与右美托咪定/瑞芬太尼镇静期间的脑电双频指数(BIS)和熵谱监测
Crit Care. 2009;13(2):137. doi: 10.1186/cc7776. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
4
A randomized evaluation of bispectral index-augmented sedation assessment in neurological patients.双谱指数增强的镇静评估在神经科患者中的随机评估
Neurocrit Care. 2009;11(1):20-7. doi: 10.1007/s12028-008-9184-6. Epub 2009 Jan 29.
电生理监测仪与镇静水平临床评估的比较。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2006 Jan;81(1):46-52. doi: 10.4065/81.1.46.
4
NIHSS training and certification using a new digital video disk is reliable.使用新型数字视频光盘进行美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)培训与认证是可靠的。
Stroke. 2005 Nov;36(11):2446-9. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000185725.42768.92. Epub 2005 Oct 13.
5
Validity and reliability of the DDS for severity of delirium in the ICU.重症监护病房中谵妄严重程度的数字谵妄量表(DDS)的效度和信度
Neurocrit Care. 2005;2(2):150-8. doi: 10.1385/NCC:2:2:150.
6
Sedation assessment in critically ill adults: 2001-2004 update.危重症成年患者的镇静评估:2001 - 2004年更新
Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Nov;38(11):1898-906. doi: 10.1345/aph.1E167. Epub 2004 Sep 14.
7
Patient State Index (PSI) measures depth of sedation in intensive care patients.患者状态指数(PSI)用于测量重症监护患者的镇静深度。
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Feb;30(2):213-216. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2092-5. Epub 2003 Dec 12.
8
Monitoring sedation status over time in ICU patients: reliability and validity of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS).对重症监护病房患者的镇静状态进行长期监测:里士满躁动镇静量表(RASS)的可靠性和有效性。
JAMA. 2003 Jun 11;289(22):2983-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.22.2983.
9
The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients.里士满躁动镇静量表:在成人重症监护病房患者中的效度和信度
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Nov 15;166(10):1338-44. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2107138.
10
Clinical practice guidelines for the sustained use of sedatives and analgesics in the critically ill adult.成人危重病患者镇静剂和镇痛药持续使用的临床实践指南
Crit Care Med. 2002 Jan;30(1):119-41. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200201000-00020.