• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床试验:弥合疗效与效果之间的差距。

Clinical trials: bridging the gap between efficacy and effectiveness.

作者信息

Depp Colin, Lebowitz Barry D

机构信息

Sam and Rose Stein Institute for Research on Aging, University of California, San Diego, California 92161, USA.

出版信息

Int Rev Psychiatry. 2007 Oct;19(5):531-9. doi: 10.1080/09540260701563320.

DOI:10.1080/09540260701563320
PMID:17896233
Abstract

The need for clinical psychiatry research to provide practical information to clinicians, families, and consumers has led to the development of new approaches to clinical trials. Efficacy trials, the historical backbone of clinical research, have many shortcomings in delivering practical information to stakeholders. The 'effectiveness' or 'public-health' model of intervention research targets a diverse group of patients across multiple settings that are outside of academic medical centres, with study design and outcomes that are selected on the basis of their potential to produce clinically meaningful information. The National Institute of Mental Health has funded three such clinical trials in recent years, respectively targeting schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease, depression, and bipolar disorder. Each of these studies has made a major impact, and provided new insights into the challenges of public health orientated trials in psychiatry. In this review, we describe the underlying principles and practical considerations in efficacy and effectiveness-orientated trials.

摘要

临床精神病学研究需要为临床医生、患者家属和消费者提供实用信息,这促使了临床试验新方法的发展。疗效试验作为临床研究的历史支柱,在向利益相关者提供实用信息方面存在许多不足。干预研究的“有效性”或“公共卫生”模式针对学术医学中心以外多种环境中的不同患者群体,其研究设计和结果是根据产生具有临床意义信息的潜力来选择的。美国国立精神卫生研究所近年来资助了三项此类临床试验,分别针对精神分裂症和阿尔茨海默病、抑郁症以及双相情感障碍。这些研究中的每一项都产生了重大影响,并为精神病学中以公共卫生为导向的试验所面临的挑战提供了新的见解。在本综述中,我们描述了以疗效和有效性为导向的试验的基本原则和实际考量。

相似文献

1
Clinical trials: bridging the gap between efficacy and effectiveness.临床试验:弥合疗效与效果之间的差距。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2007 Oct;19(5):531-9. doi: 10.1080/09540260701563320.
2
Improving mental health treatments through comparative effectiveness research.通过比较效果研究改善心理健康治疗。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 May-Jun;28(3):783-91. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.3.783.
3
How should efficacy be evaluated in randomized clinical trials of treatments for depression?在抑郁症治疗的随机临床试验中,应如何评估疗效?
J Clin Psychiatry. 1999;60 Suppl 4:23-31; discussion 32.
4
Registering clinical trials.临床试验注册
JAMA. 2003 Jul 23;290(4):516-23. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.4.516.
5
[Controlled randomized clinical trials].[对照随机临床试验]
Bull Acad Natl Med. 2007 Apr-May;191(4-5):739-56; discussion 756-8.
6
The case for practical clinical trials in psychiatry.精神病学实用临床试验的理由。
Am J Psychiatry. 2005 May;162(5):836-46. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.5.836.
7
Ethics. Clinical trials guidelines at odds with U.S. policy.伦理。临床试验指南与美国政策相悖。
Science. 2008 Oct 24;322(5901):516. doi: 10.1126/science.322.5901.516.
8
[Multicenter psychopharmacologic research and the data bank].[多中心精神药理学研究与数据库]
Acta Psychiatr Belg. 1983 May-Jun;83(3):267-81.
9
Safety reporting in randomized trials of mental health interventions.心理健康干预随机试验中的安全性报告。
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Sep;161(9):1692-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.9.1692.
10
Medicine. What are the right targets for psychopharmacology?医学。精神药理学的正确靶点是什么?
Science. 2003 Jan 17;299(5605):350-1. doi: 10.1126/science.1077141.

引用本文的文献

1
Randomized open-label study of second-generation antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia: 104-week final results of the JUMPs study assessing treatment discontinuation, remission, and social functioning.一项评估第二代抗精神病药治疗精神分裂症的停药、缓解和社会功能的随机、开放标签研究:JUMPs 研究的 104 周最终结果。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 5;24(1):600. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06031-4.
2
Generating real-world evidence in Alzheimer's disease: Considerations for establishing a core dataset.在阿尔茨海默病中生成真实世界证据:建立核心数据集的考虑因素。
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Jun;20(6):4331-4341. doi: 10.1002/alz.13785. Epub 2024 May 6.
3
The economics of psychedelic-assisted therapies: A research agenda.
迷幻剂辅助疗法的经济学:一项研究议程。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 5;13:1025726. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1025726. eCollection 2022.
4
Being influential or being misleading? Citation bias in psychiatric research and practice.具有影响力还是具有误导性?精神病学研究与实践中的引用偏差。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018 Jun;27(3):242-243. doi: 10.1017/S2045796017000816. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
5
The use of random-effects models to identify health care center-related characteristics modifying the effect of antipsychotic drugs.使用随机效应模型来识别影响抗精神病药物疗效的医疗保健中心相关特征。
Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Dec 14;9:689-698. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S145353. eCollection 2017.
6
Co-Occurring Depressive and Substance Use Disorders in Adolescents: An Examination of Reward Responsiveness During Treatment.青少年中同时存在的抑郁和物质使用障碍:治疗期间奖励反应性的考察。
J Psychother Integr. 2014 Jun;24(2):109-121. doi: 10.1037/a0036975.
7
Problem adaptation therapy for older adults with major depression and cognitive impairment: a randomized clinical trial.针对有重度抑郁症和认知障碍的老年人的问题适应疗法:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;72(1):22-30. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1305.
8
An electronic health record driven algorithm to identify incident antidepressant medication users.基于电子健康记录的算法,用于识别新发抗抑郁药物使用者。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Sep-Oct;21(5):785-91. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002699. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
9
Japan useful medication program for schizophrenia (JUMPs)-long-term study on discontinuation rate, resolution and remission, and improvement in social functioning rate associated with atypical antipsychotic medications in patients with schizophrenia.日本精神分裂症有效药物治疗方案(JUMPs)-长期研究:抗精神病药物治疗对精神分裂症患者停药率、缓解率和缓解率以及社会功能改善率的影响。
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Oct 3;13:243. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-243.
10
Understanding research misconduct: a comparative analysis of 120 cases of professional wrongdoing.理解研究不端行为:120 个专业不当行为案例的比较分析。
Account Res. 2013;20(5-6):320-38. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2013.822248.