Arvind Hemamalini, Klistorner Alexander, Graham Stuart, Grigg John, Goldberg Ivan, Klistorner Asya, Billson Frank A
Save Sight Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Oct;48(10):4590-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-0318.
To determine whether simultaneous binocular (dichoptic) stimulation for multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEP) detects glaucomatous defects and decreases intereye variability.
Twenty-eight patients with glaucoma and 30 healthy subjects underwent mfVEP on monocular and dichoptic stimulation. Dichoptic stimulation was presented with the use of virtual reality goggles (recording time, 7 minutes). Monocular mfVEPs were recorded sequentially for each eye (recording time, 10 minutes).
Comparison of mean relative asymmetry coefficient (RAC; calculated as difference in amplitudes between eyes/sum of amplitudes of both eyes at each segment) on monocular and dichoptic mfVEP revealed significantly lower RAC on dichoptic (0.003 +/- 0.03) compared with monocular testing (-0.02 +/- 0.04; P = 0.002). In all 28 patients, dichoptic mfVEP identified defects with excellent topographic correspondence. Of 56 hemifields (28 eyes), 33 had Humphrey visual field (HFA) scotomas, all of which were detected by dichoptic mfVEP. Among 23 hemifields with normal HFA, two were abnormal on monocular and dichoptic mfVEP. Five hemifields (five patients) normal on HFA and monocular mfVEP were abnormal on dichoptic mfVEP. In all five patients, corresponding rim changes were observed on disc photographs. Mean RAC of glaucomatous eyes was significantly higher on dichoptic (0.283 +/- 0.18) compared with monocular (0.199 +/- 0.12) tests (P = 0.0006).
Dichoptic mfVEP not only detects HFA losses, it may identify early defects in areas unaffected on HFA and monocular mfVEP while reducing testing time by 30%. Asymmetry was tighter among healthy subjects but wider in patients with glaucoma on simultaneous binocular stimulation, which is potentially a new tool in the early detection of glaucoma.
确定多焦点视觉诱发电位(mfVEP)的双眼同时(双眼分离)刺激是否能检测出青光眼性缺损并降低两眼间的变异性。
28例青光眼患者和30名健康受试者接受了单眼和双眼分离刺激下的mfVEP检查。使用虚拟现实护目镜进行双眼分离刺激(记录时间7分钟)。依次记录每只眼睛的单眼mfVEP(记录时间10分钟)。
单眼和双眼分离mfVEP的平均相对不对称系数(RAC;计算为各节段两眼间振幅差异/两眼振幅总和)比较显示,与单眼测试(-0.02±0.04)相比,双眼分离时RAC显著更低(0.003±0.03;P = 0.002)。在所有28例患者中,双眼分离mfVEP识别出的缺损具有出色的地形图对应性。在56个半视野(28只眼)中,33个有 Humphrey 视野(HFA)暗点,所有这些均被双眼分离mfVEP检测到。在23个HFA正常的半视野中,有2个在单眼和双眼分离mfVEP检查时异常。5个HFA和单眼mfVEP正常的半视野(5例患者)在双眼分离mfVEP检查时异常。在所有5例患者中,视盘照片上观察到相应的边缘改变。与单眼测试(0.199±0.12)相比,青光眼患眼的双眼分离平均RAC显著更高(0.283±0.18)(P = 0.0006)。
双眼分离mfVEP不仅能检测出HFA损失,还可能识别出HFA和单眼mfVEP未受影响区域的早期缺损,同时将测试时间缩短了30%。在健康受试者中,双眼同时刺激时不对称性更紧密,但在青光眼患者中更宽,这可能是青光眼早期检测的一种新工具。