Thienprasiddhi Phamornsak, Greenstein Vivienne C, Chu David H, Xu Li, Liebmann Jeffrey M, Ritch Robert, Hood Donald C
Department of Ophthalmology, The New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, NY, USA.
J Glaucoma. 2006 Aug;15(4):321-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000212237.26466.0e.
To determine whether the multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) technique can detect early functional damage in ocular hypertensive (OHT) and glaucoma suspect (GS) patients with normal standard achromatic automated perimetry (SAP) results.
Twenty-five GS patients (25 eyes), 25 patients with OHT (25 eyes), and 50 normal controls (50 eyes) were enrolled in this study. All GS, OHT and normal control eyes had normal SAP as defined by a pattern standard deviation and mean deviation within the 95% confidence interval and a glaucoma hemifield test within normal limits on the Humphrey visual field 24-2 program. Eyes with GS had optic disc changes consistent with glaucoma with or without raised intraocular pressure (IOP), and eyes with OHT showed no evidence of glaucomatous optic neuropathy and IOPs >or=22 mm Hg. Monocular mfVEPs were obtained from both eyes of each subject using a pattern-reversal dartboard array with 60 sectors. The entire display had a radius of 22.3 degrees. The mfVEPs, for each eye, were defined as abnormal when either the monocular or interocular probability plot had a cluster of 3 or more contiguous points with P<0.05 and at least 2 of these points with P<0.01.
The mfVEP results were abnormal in 4% of the eyes from normal subjects. Abnormal mfVEPs were detected in 20% of the eyes of GS patients and 16% of the eyes of OHT patients. Significantly more mfVEP abnormalities were detected in GS patients than in normal controls. However, there was no significant difference in mfVEP results between OHT patients and normal controls.
The mfVEP technique can detect visual field deficits in a minority of eyes with glaucomatous optic disks and normal SAP results.
确定多焦视觉诱发电位(mfVEP)技术能否检测出标准色觉自动视野计(SAP)结果正常的高眼压(OHT)和青光眼可疑(GS)患者的早期功能损害。
本研究纳入了25例GS患者(25只眼)、25例OHT患者(25只眼)和50例正常对照者(50只眼)。所有GS、OHT和正常对照眼的SAP均正常,根据Humphrey视野24-2程序,模式标准差和平均偏差在95%置信区间内,青光眼半视野检测在正常范围内。GS患者的眼睛有与青光眼一致的视盘改变,伴或不伴有眼压(IOP)升高,OHT患者的眼睛没有青光眼性视神经病变的证据,眼压≥22 mmHg。使用带有60个扇区的模式反转飞镖盘阵列从每个受试者的双眼获取单眼mfVEP。整个显示屏的半径为22.3度。当单眼或双眼概率图有3个或更多连续点的簇,P<0.05,且其中至少2个点P<0.01时,每只眼睛的mfVEP被定义为异常。
正常受试者4%的眼睛mfVEP结果异常。GS患者20%的眼睛和OHT患者16%的眼睛检测到异常mfVEP。GS患者检测到的mfVEP异常明显多于正常对照者。然而,OHT患者和正常对照者的mfVEP结果没有显著差异。
mfVEP技术可在少数视盘有青光眼改变且SAP结果正常的眼睛中检测到视野缺损。