• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

tenure标准的语言会影响女性的学术进步吗?

Can the Language of Tenure Criteria Influence Women's Academic Advancement?

作者信息

Marchant Angela, Bhattacharya Abhik, Carnes Molly

机构信息

Center for Women's Health Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53715, USA.

出版信息

J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2007 Sep;16(7):998-1003. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0348.

DOI:10.1089/jwh.2007.0348
PMID:17903076
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Women are not advancing to leadership positions in academic medicine at rates predicted by their representation in medical school over the past 20 years. The prejudice persists, often as an unconscious mental model, that leaders should be men. We examined whether the presence of the word "leader" in written tenure criteria may have a differential impact on promotion of men and women in elite medical schools.

METHODS

We used a retrospective, descriptive design to study 24 academic medical centers top-ranked in both NIH funding and Carnegie classification. The main outcome measure was the slope of regression fit to 7-year annual data on percent faculty who are tenured women (1998-2004) relative to the median slope of all 24 institutions.

RESULTS

Medical schools with the word "leader" in tenure criteria were more likely to have slopes below the median slope than schools without the word "leader" (OR = 6.0; CI = 1.02, 35.37; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Being a leader is associated with stereotypic male-gendered traits. Achieving tenure is a key gatekeeping point in advancement toward leadership in academic medicine. Our findings suggest that including the word "leader" in tenure criteria may promote activation and application of biases that disadvantage women's career advancement.

摘要

背景

在过去20年里,女性在学术医学领域担任领导职务的晋升速度未达到她们在医学院中的占比所预测的水平。领导者应该是男性这种偏见仍然存在,且往往是一种无意识的思维模式。我们研究了在书面任期标准中出现“领导者”一词是否可能对精英医学院中男性和女性的晋升产生不同影响。

方法

我们采用回顾性描述性设计,对在国立卫生研究院(NIH)资金和卡内基分类中均排名靠前的24个学术医学中心进行研究。主要结局指标是相对于所有24个机构的中位数斜率,对1998 - 2004年获得终身教职的女性教员百分比的7年年度数据进行回归拟合的斜率。

结果

任期标准中有“领导者”一词的医学院,其斜率低于中位数斜率的可能性比没有该词的医学院更高(比值比 = 6.0;可信区间 = 1.02, 35.37;p = 0.04)。

结论

成为领导者与刻板的男性特质相关。获得终身教职是在学术医学领域迈向领导地位的关键把关点。我们的研究结果表明,在任期标准中包含“领导者”一词可能会促使不利于女性职业发展的偏见被激活和应用。

相似文献

1
Can the Language of Tenure Criteria Influence Women's Academic Advancement?tenure标准的语言会影响女性的学术进步吗?
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2007 Sep;16(7):998-1003. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0348.
2
Using women's health research to develop women leaders in academic health sciences: the National Centers of Excellence in Women's Health.利用女性健康研究培养学术健康科学领域的女性领导者:国家卓越女性健康中心
J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2001 Jan-Feb;10(1):39-47. doi: 10.1089/152460901750067106.
3
Advancing women and closing the leadership gap: the Executive Leadership in Academic Medicine (ELAM) program experience.推动女性进步并缩小领导力差距:学术医学领域的行政领导力(ELAM)项目经验。
J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2001 Apr;10(3):271-7. doi: 10.1089/152460901300140022.
4
The leadership continuum: a framework for organizational and individual assessment relative to the advancement of women physicians and scientists.领导力连续体:一个用于评估女性医生和科学家晋升的组织和个人的框架。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Mar;20(3):387-96. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2055. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
5
Increasing Promotion of Women Faculty in Academic Medicine: Impact of National Career Development Programs.提高学术医学领域女性教职员工的比例:国家职业发展计划的影响。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Jun;29(6):837-846. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8044. Epub 2020 May 28.
6
Women's health and women's leadership in academic medicine: hitting the same glass ceiling?女性健康与女性在学术医学领域的领导力:面临同样的玻璃天花板?
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2008 Nov;17(9):1453-62. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0688.
7
Women's Experiences of Promotion and Tenure in Academic Medicine and Potential Implications for Gender Disparities in Career Advancement: A Qualitative Analysis.女性在学术医学领域的晋升经历及其对职业发展中性别差异的潜在影响:一项定性分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2125843. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.25843.
8
Sex Differences in Academic Rank and Publication Rate at Top-Ranked US Neurology Programs.顶尖美国神经病学项目的学术排名和发表率中的性别差异。
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Aug 1;75(8):956-961. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0275.
9
Perspectives of female medical faculty in Ethiopia on a leadership fellowship program.埃塞俄比亚女性医学教员对领导力奖学金项目的看法。
Int J Med Educ. 2017 Sep 1;8:314-323. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5985.f644.
10
Identifying Gender Disparities and Barriers to Measuring the Status of Female Faculty: The Experience of a Large School of Medicine.识别性别差异和衡量女性教职员工地位的障碍:一所大型医学院的经验。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Nov;28(11):1569-1575. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7610. Epub 2019 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Becoming Leaders - A Qualitative Research Study on the Priorities and Concerns of Early Career Women Faculty in Academic Medicine.成为领导者——一项关于医学学术领域早期职业女性教员优先事项和关注点的定性研究
J Healthc Leadersh. 2024 Dec 2;16:511-523. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S499001. eCollection 2024.
2
Perceived Barriers to Professional Equality Among Women in Gastroenterology.胃肠病学领域女性职业平等的认知障碍
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul 18;5(5):226-233. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwac023. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
Hiring women into senior leadership positions is associated with a reduction in gender stereotypes in organizational language.
聘请女性进入高级领导职位与减少组织语言中的性别刻板印象有关。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Mar 1;119(9). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2026443119.
4
Women's Experiences of Promotion and Tenure in Academic Medicine and Potential Implications for Gender Disparities in Career Advancement: A Qualitative Analysis.女性在学术医学领域的晋升经历及其对职业发展中性别差异的潜在影响:一项定性分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2125843. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.25843.
5
Women's leadership in academic medicine: a systematic review of extent, condition and interventions.女性在学术医学中的领导地位:系统评价的范围、条件和干预措施。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 15;10(1):e032232. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032232.
6
How Gender Stereotypes May Limit Female Faculty Advancement in Communication Sciences and Disorders.性别刻板印象如何限制传播学与障碍科学领域女性教职人员的发展。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Nov 21;27(4):1598-1611. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0140.
7
What is in a Pronoun?: Why Gender-fair Language Matters.代词里有什么?:为什么性别公平语言很重要。
Ann Surg. 2017 Dec;266(6):932-933. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002505.
8
Are Female Applicants Disadvantaged in National Institutes of Health Peer Review? Combining Algorithmic Text Mining and Qualitative Methods to Detect Evaluative Differences in R01 Reviewers' Critiques.女性申请者在美国国立卫生研究院同行评审中处于劣势吗?结合算法文本挖掘和定性方法来检测R01评审员评语中的评价差异。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 May;26(5):560-570. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.6021. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
9
Tenure Track Policy Increases Representation of Women in Senior Academic Positions, but Is Insufficient to Achieve Gender Balance.终身教职政策增加了女性在高级学术职位中的占比,但不足以实现性别平衡。
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 29;11(9):e0163376. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163376. eCollection 2016.
10
A global call for action to include gender in research impact assessment.一项将性别因素纳入研究影响评估的全球行动呼吁。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Jul 19;14(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0126-z.