De Vries J, De Jongste M J L, Spincemaille G, Staal M J
Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 2007;32:63-89. doi: 10.1007/978-3-211-47423-5_4.
Ischemic disease (ID) is now an important indication for electrical neuromodulation (NM), particularly in chronic pain conditions. NM is defined as a therapeutic modality that aims to restore functions of the nervous system or modulate neural structures involved in the dysfunction of organ systems. One of the NM methods used is chronic electrical stimulation of the spinal cord (spinal cord stimulation: SCS). SCS in ID, as applied to ischemic heart disease (IHD) and peripheral vascular disease (PVD), started in Europe in the 1970s and 1980s, respectively. Patients with ID are eligible for SCS when they experience disabling pain, resulting from ischaemia. This pain should be considered therapeutically refractory to standard treatment intended to decrease metabolic demand or following revascularization procedures. Several studies have demonstrated the beneficial effect of SCS on IHD and PVD by improving the quality of life of this group of severely disabled patients, without adversely influencing mortality and morbidity. SCS used as additional treatment for IHD reduces angina pectoris (AP) in its frequency and intensity, increases exercise capacity, and does not seem to mask the warning signs of a myocardial infarction. Besides the analgesic effect, different studies have demonstrated an anti-ischemic effect, as expressed by different cardiac indices such as exercise duration, ambulatory ECG recording, coronary flow measurements, and PET scans. SCS can be considered as an alternative to open heart bypass grafting (CABG) for patients at high risk from surgical procedures. Moreover, SCS appears to be more efficacious than transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). The SCS implantation technique is relatively simple: implanting an epidural electrode under local anesthesia (supervised by the anesthesist) with the tip at T1, covering the painful area with paraesthesia by external stimulation (pulse width 210, rate 85 Hz), and connecting this electrode to a subcutaneously implanted pulse generator. In PVD the pain may manifest itself at rest or during walking (claudication), disabling the patient severely. Most of the patients suffer from atherosclerotic critical limb ischemia. All patients should be therapeutically refractory (medication and revascularization) to become eligible for SCS. Ulcers on the extremities should be minimal. In PVD the same implantation technique is used as in IHD except that the tip of the electrode is positioned at T10-11. In PVD the majority of the patients show significant reduction in pain and more than half of the patients show improvement of circulatory indices, as shown by Doppler, thermography, and oximetry studies. Limb salvage studies show variable results depending on the stage of the trophic changes. The underlying mechanisms of action of SCS in PVD require further elucidation.
缺血性疾病(ID)如今是电神经调节(NM)的一项重要适应症,尤其是在慢性疼痛病症中。NM被定义为一种旨在恢复神经系统功能或调节参与器官系统功能障碍的神经结构的治疗方式。所使用的NM方法之一是脊髓慢性电刺激(脊髓刺激:SCS)。ID中的SCS,应用于缺血性心脏病(IHD)和外周血管疾病(PVD)时,分别于20世纪70年代和80年代在欧洲开始应用。ID患者在因缺血而经历致残性疼痛时适合接受SCS治疗。这种疼痛在治疗上应被视为对旨在降低代谢需求的标准治疗或血管重建术后治疗无效。多项研究已证明SCS对IHD和PVD具有有益效果,可改善这组严重残疾患者的生活质量,且不会对死亡率和发病率产生不利影响。用作IHD辅助治疗的SCS可降低心绞痛(AP)的频率和强度,提高运动能力,且似乎不会掩盖心肌梗死的警示信号。除镇痛作用外,不同研究还证明了其抗缺血作用,这可通过不同的心脏指标来体现,如运动持续时间、动态心电图记录、冠状动脉血流测量和PET扫描。对于手术风险高的患者,SCS可被视为心脏搭桥手术(CABG)的替代方法。此外,SCS似乎比经皮电神经刺激(TENS)更有效。SCS植入技术相对简单:在局部麻醉下(由麻醉师监督)植入硬膜外电极,电极尖端位于T1,通过外部刺激(脉冲宽度210,频率85Hz)使覆盖疼痛区域产生感觉异常,然后将该电极连接至皮下植入的脉冲发生器。在PVD中,疼痛可能在休息时或行走时出现(间歇性跛行),严重影响患者活动能力。大多数患者患有动脉粥样硬化性严重肢体缺血。所有患者在治疗上应无效(药物治疗和血管重建)才适合接受SCS治疗。肢体溃疡应尽量少。在PVD中,使用与IHD相同的植入技术,只是电极尖端位于T10 - 11。在PVD中,大多数患者疼痛明显减轻,超过一半的患者循环指标有所改善,这通过多普勒、热成像和血氧测定研究得以证实。肢体挽救研究结果因营养变化阶段而异。SCS在PVD中的潜在作用机制尚需进一步阐明。