Curtis Lesley H, Al-Khatib Sana M, Shea Alisa M, Hammill Bradley G, Hernandez Adrian F, Schulman Kevin A
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina 27715, USA.
JAMA. 2007 Oct 3;298(13):1517-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.13.1517.
Previous studies of sex differences in the use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) predate recent expansions in Medicare coverage and did not provide patient follow-up over multiple years.
To examine sex differences in ICD use for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Analysis of a 5% national sample of research-identifiable files obtained from the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for the period 1991 through 2005. Patients were those aged 65 years or older with Medicare fee-for-service coverage and diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction and either heart failure or cardiomyopathy but no prior cardiac arrest or ventricular tachycardia (ie, the primary prevention cohort [n = 65,917 men and 70,504 women]), or with cardiac arrest or ventricular tachycardia (ie, the secondary prevention cohort [n = 52,252 men and 47,411 women]), from 1999 through 2005.
Receipt of ICD therapy and all-cause mortality at 1 year.
In the 2005 primary prevention cohort, 32.3 per 1000 men and 8.6 per 1000 women received ICD therapy within 1 year of cohort entry. In multivariate analyses, men were more likely than women to receive ICD therapy (hazard ratio [HR], 3.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.86-3.47). Among men and women alive at 180 days after cohort entry, the hazard of mortality in the subsequent year was not significantly lower among those who received ICD therapy (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.82-1.23). In the 2005 secondary prevention cohort, 102.2 per 1000 men and 38.4 per 1000 women received ICD therapy. Controlling for demographic variables and comorbid conditions, men were more likely than women to receive ICD therapy (HR, 2.44; 95% CI, 2.30-2.59). Among men and women alive at 30 days after cohort entry, the hazard of mortality in the subsequent year was significantly lower among those who received ICD therapy (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.60-0.71).
In the Medicare population, women are significantly less likely than men to receive ICD therapy for primary or secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death.
先前关于植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)使用中性别差异的研究早于医疗保险覆盖范围的近期扩大,且未对患者进行多年随访。
研究ICD用于心脏性猝死一级和二级预防时的性别差异。
设计、设置和参与者:对1991年至2005年期间从美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心获取的5%全国性可识别研究文件样本进行分析。患者为年龄在65岁及以上、拥有医疗保险按服务收费覆盖且被诊断为急性心肌梗死并伴有心力衰竭或心肌病但无既往心脏骤停或室性心动过速的人群(即一级预防队列,男性65917例,女性70504例),或1999年至2005年期间有心脏骤停或室性心动过速的人群(即二级预防队列,男性52252例,女性47411例)。
ICD治疗的接受情况以及1年时的全因死亡率。
在2005年的一级预防队列中,每1000名男性中有32.3人在队列进入后1年内接受了ICD治疗,每1000名女性中有8.6人接受了ICD治疗。在多变量分析中,男性比女性更有可能接受ICD治疗(风险比[HR]为3.15;95%置信区间[CI]为2.86 - 3.47)。在队列进入后180天仍存活的男性和女性中,接受ICD治疗者在随后一年的死亡风险并未显著降低(HR为1.01;95%CI为0.82 - 1.23)。在2005年的二级预防队列中,每1000名男性中有102.2人接受了ICD治疗,每1000名女性中有38.4人接受了ICD治疗。在控制了人口统计学变量和合并症后,男性比女性更有可能接受ICD治疗(HR为2.44;95%CI为2.30 - 2.59)。在队列进入后30天仍存活的男性和女性中,接受ICD治疗者在随后一年的死亡风险显著降低(HR为0.65;95%CI为0.60 - 0.71)。
在医疗保险人群中,女性接受ICD治疗用于心脏性猝死一级或二级预防的可能性显著低于男性。