Breen R, Pyper S, Rusk Y, Dockrell S
Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Ergonomics. 2007 Oct;50(10):1582-92. doi: 10.1080/00140130701584944.
This study investigated schoolchildren's posture and discomfort while working at computers. Sixty-eight children (mean age 9.5 years) were observed at school during normal computer sessions lasting 15-25 min. Rapid upper limb assessment (RULA) was used to evaluate posture, and a body discomfort chart (BDC) and a modified visual analogue scale (VAS) were used to record site and intensity of discomfort. Computer tasks were noted and in accordance with RULA, postures were classified as Action Level (AL) 1 (acceptable) to 4 (needs immediate change). Most children adopted postures at an unacceptable level while working at computers. None of the postures were in AL 1; 60% were in AL 2; 38% were in AL 3; and 2% were in AL 4. Posture became worse over time. Poor posture was associated with discomfort, but it is not clear if it was related to the sitting posture or to the computer use. Children who reported discomfort had a higher mean RULA grand score (5.0) than those who did not report discomfort (4.4). The type of computer task influenced the children's posture. RULA proved generally to be a suitable method for evaluating children's posture.
本研究调查了学童在使用电脑时的姿势及不适情况。在学校正常的15 - 25分钟电脑课期间,对68名儿童(平均年龄9.5岁)进行了观察。采用快速上肢评估法(RULA)评估姿势,使用身体不适图表(BDC)和改良视觉模拟评分法(VAS)记录不适部位及强度。记录电脑任务,并根据RULA将姿势分为动作水平(AL)1(可接受)至4(需立即改变)。大多数儿童在使用电脑时采用了不可接受水平的姿势。没有姿势处于AL 1;60%处于AL 2;38%处于AL 3;2%处于AL 4。随着时间推移,姿势变得更差。不良姿势与不适有关,但不清楚这是与坐姿还是与电脑使用有关。报告有不适的儿童平均RULA总分(5.0)高于未报告不适的儿童(4.4)。电脑任务类型影响儿童姿势。RULA总体上被证明是评估儿童姿势的合适方法。