de Seze Jérôme, Debouverie Marc, Zephir Hélène, Lebrun Christine, Blanc Frédéric, Bourg Véronique, Wiertlewski Sandrine, Pittion Sophie, Laplaud David, Le Page Emmanuelle, Deschamps Romain, Cabre Philippe, Pelletier Jean, Malikova Irina, Clavelou Pierre, Jaillon Valérie, Defer Gilles, Labauge Pierre, Gout Olivier, Boulay Clotilde, Edan Gilles, Vermersch Patrick
Departement de Neurologie, Hôpital Civil, 1 Place de l'Hôpital, BP 426, 67091 Strasbourg CEDEX, France.
Arch Neurol. 2007 Oct;64(10):1426-32. doi: 10.1001/archneur.64.10.1426.
Acute demyelinating encephalomyelitis (ADEM) is characterized by a severe inflammatory attack, frequently secondary to infectious events or vaccinations. To date, no clear criteria exist for ADEM, and the risk of subsequent evolution to multiple sclerosis (MS) remains unknown.
To evaluate the risk of evolution to MS after a first episode of ADEM.
Observational, retrospective case study.
Thirteen French MS centers. Patients We retrospectively studied 60 patients with ADEM who were older than 15 years with no history suggestive of an inflammatory event who presented to MS centers from January 1, 1995, through December 31, 2005. We excluded 6 patients with multiphasic ADEM because this is a rare condition and somewhat difficult to classify. After a mean follow-up of 3.1 years (range, 1-10 years), the remaining 54 patients were then classified into 2 groups: monophasic ADEM (ADEM group) (n = 35) and clinically definite MS (MS group) (n = 19).
Clinical, laboratory, magnetic resonance imaging, and follow-up data were evaluated for each group.
Patients in the ADEM group more frequently had atypical symptoms of MS (26 of 35 [74%]) than patients with MS (8 of 19 [42%]) (P = .02). Oligoclonal bands were more frequently observed in the MS group (16 of 19 [84%]) than in the ADEM group (7 of 35 [20%]) (P <.001). Patients in the ADEM group more frequently had gray matter involvement (21 of 35 [60%]) than those in the MS group (2 of 19 [11%]) (P <.001). On the basis of these results, we consider that the presence of any 2 of the following 3 criteria could be used to differentiate patients with ADEM from those with MS in our cohort: atypical clinical symptoms for MS, absence of oligoclonal bands, and gray matter involvement. On this basis, 29 of the 35 patients in the ADEM group (83%) and 18 of the 19 patients in the MS group (95%) were classified in the appropriate category.
Our study found some differences concerning the risk of evolution to clinically definite MS after a first demyelinating episode suggestive of ADEM. These findings led us to propose criteria that should now be tested in a larger, prospective cohort study.
急性脱髓鞘性脑脊髓炎(ADEM)的特征是严重的炎症发作,常继发于感染或接种疫苗后。迄今为止,尚无明确的ADEM诊断标准,其随后发展为多发性硬化症(MS)的风险仍不清楚。
评估首次发生ADEM后发展为MS的风险。
观察性回顾性病例研究。
13个法国的MS中心。
我们回顾性研究了1995年1月1日至2005年12月31日期间到MS中心就诊的60例年龄大于15岁、无提示炎症事件病史的ADEM患者。我们排除了6例多相性ADEM患者,因为这是一种罕见情况且分类有些困难。在平均随访3.1年(范围1 - 10年)后,其余54例患者被分为两组:单相性ADEM(ADEM组)(n = 35)和临床确诊的MS(MS组)(n = 19)。
对每组患者的临床、实验室、磁共振成像及随访数据进行评估。
ADEM组患者出现MS非典型症状的比例(35例中的26例[74%])高于MS组患者(19例中的8例[42%])(P = 0.02)。MS组中寡克隆带的出现频率(19例中的16例[84%])高于ADEM组(35例中的7例[20%])(P < 0.001)。ADEM组患者灰质受累的比例(35例中的21例[60%])高于MS组(19例中的2例[11%])(P < 0.001)。基于这些结果,我们认为在我们的队列中,以下3条标准中的任意2条可用于区分ADEM患者和MS患者:MS的非典型临床症状、无寡克隆带以及灰质受累。据此,ADEM组35例患者中的29例(83%)和MS组19例患者中的18例(95%)被正确分类。
我们的研究发现,首次脱髓鞘发作提示为ADEM后发展为临床确诊MS的风险存在一些差异。这些发现促使我们提出相应标准,现在应在更大规模的前瞻性队列研究中进行验证。