Ziegler A E, Zimmer H, Triebig G
Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational and Social Medicine, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Vossstrasse 2, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008 May;81(6):743-53. doi: 10.1007/s00420-007-0264-2. Epub 2007 Oct 9.
Aim of the study was to examine possible chemosensory effects of epsilon-caprolactam in the low concentration range relevant to indoor environmental conditions.
Twenty healthy subjects (10 male, 10 female) aged from 21 to 38 years were exposed for 6 h, respectively, to 0, 0.15, 0.5 and 5 mg/m3 epsilon-caprolactam vapours in a randomized and double-blind method. As a measure of trigeminal stimulation of the eye, blink frequency was video-recorded four times per day and evaluated by using a new semi-automatic, computer-assisted method compared to baseline recording and manual counting. Digital slit lamp photographs were taken at the same time to examine conjunctival hyperaemia. A standardized ophthalmologic grading scale was used to measure redness of the eyes objectively. Active anterior rhinomanometry compared nasal resistance before and after exposure. Subjective ratings of discomfort and mental orientation were assessed using the German version of the Swedish Performance Evaluation system (SPES). As a measure of personality traits, positive and negative affectivity was determined (PANAS).
Six hour exposures to epsilon-caprolactam revealed no significant dose-response relationship concerning blink frequency, nasal resistance and redness of the bulbar conjunctiva. Subjective ratings of discomfort (sum scores) significantly increased only at the highest concentration of 5 mg/m3. However, the increase in discomfort was only moderate, ranging between "not at all" and "somewhat". Significant increases of the subjective detection of malodour (subscore) already occurred at 0.15 mg/m3, showing no adaptation over time. Irritation of the eyes or upper airways was not reported.
Exposure to epsilon-caprolactam vapour did not elicit any acute health effects in a concentration range up to 0.5 mg/m3. Even at the highest concentration of 5 mg/m3, we could only find a slight increase in subjective symptoms, mainly due to an unincisive increase of perception of malodour.
本研究旨在考察在与室内环境条件相关的低浓度范围内,ε-己内酰胺可能产生的化学感觉效应。
20名年龄在21至38岁之间的健康受试者(10名男性,10名女性),以随机双盲方式分别暴露于0、0.15、0.5和5mg/m³的ε-己内酰胺蒸气中6小时。作为眼部三叉神经刺激的一项指标,每天对眨眼频率进行4次视频记录,并采用一种新的半自动计算机辅助方法与基线记录和人工计数相比进行评估。同时拍摄数字裂隙灯照片以检查结膜充血情况。使用标准化眼科分级量表客观测量眼睛发红程度。采用主动前鼻测压法比较暴露前后的鼻阻力。使用瑞典性能评估系统(SPES)德文版评估不适和精神定向的主观评分。作为人格特质的一项指标,测定积极和消极情感(PANAS)。
暴露于ε-己内酰胺6小时,在眨眼频率、鼻阻力和球结膜发红方面未显示出显著的剂量反应关系。不适的主观评分(总分)仅在最高浓度5mg/m³时显著增加。然而,不适的增加仅为中度水平,介于“完全没有”和“有点”之间。在0.15mg/m³时,恶臭主观检测(子分数)就已显著增加,且未随时间出现适应现象。未报告有眼部或上呼吸道刺激情况。
暴露于ε-己内酰胺蒸气在浓度高达0.5mg/m³范围内未引发任何急性健康影响。即使在最高浓度5mg/m³时,我们也仅发现主观症状略有增加,主要是由于恶臭感知的轻微增加。