Breban Romulus, Vardavas Raffaele, Blower Sally
Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1555, USA.
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2007 Sep;76(3 Pt 1):031127. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.031127. Epub 2007 Sep 24.
Recently we have introduced an inductive reasoning game of voluntary yearly vaccination to establish whether or not a population of individuals acting in their own self-interest would be able to prevent influenza epidemics. Here, we analyze our model to describe the dynamics of the collective yearly vaccination uptake. We discuss the mean-field equations of our model and first order effects of fluctuations. We explain why our model predicts that severe epidemics are periodically expected even without the introduction of pandemic strains. We find that fluctuations in the collective yearly vaccination uptake induce severe epidemics with an expected periodicity that depends on the number of independent decision makers in the population. The mean-field dynamics also reveal that there are conditions for which the dynamics become robust to the fluctuations. However, the transition between fluctuation-sensitive and fluctuation-robust dynamics occurs for biologically implausible parameters. We also analyze our model when incentive-based vaccination programs are offered. When a family-based incentive is offered, the expected periodicity of severe epidemics is increased. This results from the fact that the number of independent decision makers is reduced, increasing the effect of the fluctuations. However, incentives based on the number of years of prepayment of vaccination may yield fluctuation-robust dynamics where severe epidemics are prevented. In this case, depending on prepayment, the transition between fluctuation-sensitive and fluctuation-robust dynamics may occur for biologically plausible parameters. Our analysis provides a practical method for identifying how many years of free vaccination should be provided in order to successfully ameliorate influenza epidemics.
最近,我们引入了一个关于自愿年度疫苗接种的归纳推理游戏,以确定一群追求自身利益的个体是否能够预防流感流行。在此,我们分析我们的模型来描述集体年度疫苗接种率的动态变化。我们讨论了模型的平均场方程以及波动的一阶效应。我们解释了为什么我们的模型预测即使不引入大流行毒株,严重的流行病也会周期性出现。我们发现集体年度疫苗接种率的波动会引发严重的流行病,其预期周期取决于人群中独立决策者的数量。平均场动态还表明,在某些条件下,动态变化对波动具有鲁棒性。然而,波动敏感和波动鲁棒动态之间的转变发生在生物学上不合理的参数情况下。我们还分析了提供基于激励的疫苗接种计划时的模型。当提供基于家庭的激励措施时,严重流行病的预期周期会增加。这是因为独立决策者的数量减少,增加了波动的影响。然而,基于疫苗接种预付款年限的激励措施可能会产生波动鲁棒的动态变化,从而预防严重的流行病。在这种情况下,根据预付款情况,波动敏感和波动鲁棒动态之间的转变可能发生在生物学上合理的参数情况下。我们的分析提供了一种实用方法,用于确定应提供多少年的免费疫苗接种才能成功缓解流感流行。