评估成人注意力缺陷多动障碍患者生活质量享受与满意度问卷简版的有效性。
Assessing the validity of the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form in adults with ADHD.
作者信息
Mick Eric, Faraone Stephen V, Spencer Thomas, Zhang Huabin F, Biederman Joseph
机构信息
Massachusetts General Hospital, Pediatric Psychopharmacology Research Unit, Boston MA 02114, USA.
出版信息
J Atten Disord. 2008 Jan;11(4):504-9. doi: 10.1177/1087054707308468. Epub 2007 Oct 12.
OBJECTIVE
The authors assessed the psychometric properties of the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LES-QSF) in adults with ADHD.
METHOD
One hundred fifty ADHD and 134 non-ADHD adults from a case-control study and 173 adults randomized to placebo or methylphenidate were assessed with the Q-LES-QSF and the Social Adjustment Scale (SAS). Response to change was estimated by comparing change in Q-LES-QSF scores in responders and nonresponders in our randomized clinical trial.
RESULTS
Internal consistency of the Q-LES-QSF items was .88, and the correlation between the Q-LES-QSF total score and the SAS total T score was .72 in adults with ADHD. ADHD cases had statistically significantly poorer scores on the Q-LES-QSF than controls (76.5 +/- 10.9 vs. 59.2 +/- 17.3, p < .001), whereas ADHD responders showed Q-LES-QSF improvement compared to nonresponders (76.1 +/- 12.0 versus 67.9 +/- 14.5, p < .001).
CONCLUSION
These results support the validity of the Q-LES-QSF as a measure of quality of life in adults with ADHD.
目的
作者评估了成人注意力缺陷多动障碍（ADHD）患者生活质量享受与满意度问卷简表（Q-LES-QSF）的心理测量特性。
方法
对来自一项病例对照研究的150名ADHD成人和134名非ADHD成人，以及173名随机分配接受安慰剂或哌甲酯治疗的成人，使用Q-LES-QSF和社会适应量表（SAS）进行评估。通过比较我们随机临床试验中反应者和无反应者Q-LES-QSF分数的变化来估计对变化的反应。
结果
ADHD成人中，Q-LES-QSF项目的内部一致性为0.88，Q-LES-QSF总分与SAS总T分之间的相关性为0.72。ADHD病例在Q-LES-QSF上的得分在统计学上显著低于对照组（76.5±10.9对59.2±17.3，p<0.001），而ADHD反应者与无反应者相比，Q-LES-QSF有所改善（76.1±12.0对67.9±14.5，p<0.001）。
结论
这些结果支持Q-LES-QSF作为ADHD成人生活质量测量工具的有效性。
Zotero 插件